Audio By Carbonatix
Andy Appiah-Kubi, lawyer for Ashanti Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Wontumi, has clarified that his client's decision to initiate plea bargain discussions with the state in the ongoing criminal trial over an alleged GH¢14.3 million loan fraud involving the Ghana Export-Import Bank (Exim Bank) does not amount to an admission of guilt.
Speaking in an interview on JoyNews' The Pulse on Thursday, June 11, Mr Appiah-Kubi confirmed that proceedings have been initiated to begin negotiations with the state under Ghana's plea bargaining framework.
"We have initiated proceedings to begin plea bargaining agreement discussions. At this stage, we have asked for the commencement of negotiations with the hope of arriving at a plea bargain agreement," he said.
According to him, the move is in line with provisions under Ghana's Criminal Procedure Act, which allows an accused person to apply for plea bargaining at any stage of criminal proceedings.
He noted that plea bargaining discussions are intended to create an avenue for resolving legal issues in a manner that could benefit all parties involved, describing the process as an effort to achieve a "win-win" outcome.
Read also: Wontumi seeks plea deal in GH¢30m Exim Bank fraud trial — AG notifies High Court
"Under the law, an accused person may apply for a plea bargaining agreement. This is what we have done. We have entered into the process hoping that, through negotiations, we may arrive at a mutually acceptable outcome," he stated.
The lawyer emphasised that the application should not be misconstrued as an acknowledgement of wrongdoing by his client.
"There is no presumption of guilt. We have not entered into any agreement yet. We are merely taking advantage of a legal provision that allows parties to negotiate. That is all," he stressed.
Mr. Appiah-Kubi further maintained that Wontumi continues to enjoy the constitutional presumption of innocence and remains innocent until proven guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction.
"Our concern is that the accused person has the right to be treated as innocent until proven guilty. We are saying that he remains innocent, and that position stands pending the outcome of any negotiations," he said.
The clarification comes amid public debate over the implications of Wontumi's decision to seek plea bargain discussions, with some interpreting the move as an indication of culpability.
Latest Stories
-
John Jinapor promises accountability after Akosombo Substation Fire report
23 seconds -
Where things stand for Chairman Wontumi: Three cases, a looming mining verdict, a plea deal in play
3 minutes -
MTN refurbishes 300 beds to improve healthcare at Ho Teaching Hospital
13 minutes -
Okada rider recounts near-drowning rescue attempt during Ngleshie Amanfro floods
14 minutes -
John Dumelo provides free DStv, giant screens and kenkey meals for Ayawaso West World Cup fans
16 minutes -
Aflao youth demand justice for slain MoMo vendor, Christopher Ahordo after key suspect escaped custody
22 minutes -
Martin Kpebu explains possible outcomes of plea bargain in Wontumi’s case
25 minutes -
STAR-Ghana Foundation advocates volunteerism as a pillar of national development
26 minutes -
Fire destroys 20-room compound house in Wiawso
27 minutes -
NLA workers issue strike notice over poor conditions, governance concerns
34 minutes -
Fire destroys bedrooms at Tuba Fulani Junction
38 minutes -
Wontumi Exim Bank fraud trial: ‘I support plea bargain 150%’ – Martin Kpebu
42 minutes -
Bagbin rejects “functus officio” claim, says Parliament can still revisit passed bills before assent
1 hour -
NACOC, GSA begin scientific testing of seized drugs ahead of 2026 World Drug Day destruction
1 hour -
Speaker raises concern over increasing cases being pushed to Supreme Court
1 hour