Audio By Carbonatix
Prince Harry is seeking a judicial review against a refusal of the Home Office to allow him to personally pay for police protection when in the UK.
The US-based Duke of Sussex says his private security team does not have adequate jurisdiction abroad.
He lost his taxpayer-funded police security after stepping back from royal duties in 2020.
Prince Harry says he wants to visit his home country with his family but needs to "ensure" their safety.
The application for a judicial review - a challenge in the High Court against the decision of a public body or government department - follows a security incident in London in July 2021 when the duke's car was chased by photographers as he left a charity event.
A legal representative for Prince Harry said the legal claim was filed in September "to challenge the decision-making behind the security procedures, in the hopes that this could be re-evaluated for the obvious and necessary protection required".
Prince Harry wants to personally fund police protection, "not to impose on the taxpayer", they said.
The duke, who is now based in California, is arguing that his private security team cannot replicate the work of police protection in the UK, with their access to local intelligence and legal jurisdiction.
A statement said: "Prince Harry inherited a security risk at birth, for life.
"He remains sixth in line to the throne, served two tours of combat duty in Afghanistan, and in recent years his family has been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats."
His legal representative said he offered to pay the costs of police protection in January 2020 at Sandringham, when talks with the Queen were being held over the Sussexes' future role. But the offer was dismissed, the representative said.
"The UK will always be Prince Harry's home and a country he wants his wife and children to be safe in. With the lack of police protection, comes too great a personal risk," the statement said.
The Sussexes' daughter, Lilibet, is now seven months old and has yet to meet her great-grandmother the Queen, grandfather the Prince of Wales and other members of the family.
The couple were forced to disclose they had put in place "privately funded security arrangements" for their move to the US, after then-president Donald Trump said the country would not pay for their protection.
A government spokesperson said the UK's "protective security system is rigorous and proportionate".
They added: "It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements. To do so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals' security."
Latest Stories
-
Investigate alleged US$1.7bn loss – Abena Osei Asare to Mahama
33 seconds -
Political parties, judiciary need reforms to protect African democracy — Asiedu Nketiah
2 minutes -
GAUA strike: NLC says administrators may have breached procedure for industrial action
3 minutes -
Photos: Republic Bank, The Multimedia Group sign 3-year deal to launch JoyNews Habitat Fair partnership
5 minutes -
Continuity: The engine of compounding
10 minutes -
AI offer lifeline to developing economies in an era of weak growth – World Bank
19 minutes -
Forefathers built better roads with less education than today’s educated generation – Prof Bokpin
21 minutes -
Kayayei interventions must go beyond skills training – Vice President
25 minutes -
Former Nandom MP Ambrose Dery declares intention to contest again in 2028
33 minutes -
GSE delivers 75% year-to-date return for investors as of July 2026
36 minutes -
IDEG: NDC, NPP disagreement over local elections hindering decentralisation reforms
40 minutes -
Wontumi appeal has no reasonable chance of success – AG opposes bail application
43 minutes -
2026 National Youth Conference: Osman Ayariga challenges youth to prioritise character and patriotism
44 minutes -
2026 National Youth Conference: Osman Ayariga calls for stronger youth participation in decision-making
45 minutes -
MTN Ghana delivers strong H1 2026 performance driven by data, digital and fintech growth
47 minutes