The Supreme Court has dismissed as meritorious an application filed by Dr. Stephen Opuni invoking the inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to prohibit the trial judge from handling his case.
Dr. Opuni in his statement of claim indicated that there have been persistent acts of bias on the part of the trial judge and if the trial judge is not prohibited, he won’t be fair to him.
According to Dr. Opuni, the judge he purports to prohibit has already taken a position in the matter under adjudication, hence his application before the court.
The former Ghana Cocobod CEO and the Managing Director of Agricult Ghana Limited, a fertilizer manufacturing company, are being prosecuted for alleged involvement in procurement breaches and causing financial loss to the state in a fertilizer deal.
Dr Opuni explained that on July 25, 2023, the High Court adopted the proceedings and those proceedings weren’t made available to his legal team.
He contends that he doesn’t know the content of the day’s proceedings except a document that was waived by the judge.
“My Lords, the Proceedings were about three thousand pages. We asked for the proceedings and the judge called the registrar to furnish us with the proceedings adopted.
"What made me suspicious was that the judge said he wouldn’t make a further order for the proceedings to be given to us,” he said.
Chief State Attorney, Evelyn Keelson, opposed the application.
She said the applicant has not been able to raise any credible issues of bias .
According to her, “What he (the applicant) has told the court are mere allegations and complaints.”
She further stated that the judge gave directives to all the parties to apply for the proceedings but the applicant didn’t apply for the proceedings and that’s why he doesn’t have it.
She recounts that the applicant waited until the day when the court was to adopt the proceedings and even on that day the registrar was called to supply them with the proceedings.
She further averred that the applicant has failed to properly invoke the Supreme Court’s inherent jurisdiction to prohibit the trial court judge.
The panel of five justices presided over by Justice Gabriel Pwamang said, “We have read the processes filed and listened to both lawyers and we are not convinced that the trial judge exhibited any bias. We hereby dismiss the application for prohibition.”
Latest Stories
-
Reason for training professional counsellors is to heal a hurting world – CCP president
18 mins -
Woman allegedly brings dead man to bank to take out a loan
26 mins -
It’s a good feeling to score against PSG because I’m a Marseille boy – Andre Ayew
51 mins -
Joe Lartey Sr: A voice that brought life to Ghana sports and beyond
1 hour -
Bawumia promises to tackle issue most dear to Ghanaians as he begins nationwide campaign
3 hours -
Indian couple donate $24m fortune to charity to adopt monkhood
3 hours -
Australians call for tougher laws on violence against women after killings
3 hours -
African Development Council establishes mission in Benin for Francophone countries
4 hours -
Okyeame Kwame reveals his secret to longevity in music industry
4 hours -
Youthful-looking 60-year-old woman qualifies for Miss Argentina contest
4 hours -
Ejisu By-Election: Campaign heats up as NPP holds final rally ahead of Polls on Tuesday
4 hours -
Rwanda plan: Irish government wants to send asylum seekers back to UK
4 hours -
Ice cubes now cost more than bread and milk in parts of Mali
6 hours -
Titanic gold pocket watch sells for £900,000
7 hours -
Elon Musk in China to discuss enabling full self driving – reports
7 hours