Audio By Carbonatix
Private legal practitioner Thaddeus Sory has strongly criticised the actions of the Special Prosecutor (SP) and Parliament in their handling of the pursuit of former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta.
Sory, in an opinion piece, questioned the fairness of SP Kissi Agyebeng’s conduct in declaring Ofori-Atta a fugitive from justice and labelling security officials who invaded his home as rogues, as well as the necessity of Parliament’s involvement in the matter.
At the core of Sory’s argument is the fundamental principle of justice that no individual should be judged without first being heard.
He says this principle, deeply rooted in natural law, was demonstrated even in biblical accounts where Adam was given the opportunity to explain himself before facing consequences.
Sory disagreed with the SP’s approach to the case, particularly in branding the actions of certain state officials who entered the former Minister’s residence as “roguish.”
According to him, the SP acknowledged that these individuals were state officials carrying out their official duties, yet failed to seek an explanation before condemning them.
He questioned the authority of the SP to determine the lawfulness of other officials’ actions, arguing that such judgments should be based on established legal procedures rather than personal assessments.
Furthermore, Sory criticized the Special Prosecutor’s handling of the case, stating that if there were sufficient grounds for prosecuting Ken Ofori-Atta, the appropriate legal processes should be followed rather than issuing repeated public statements.
He suggested that Kissi Agyebeng’s actions amounted to grandstanding, wasting valuable time and resources while failing to produce tangible results.
In addition to faulting the SP, Sory took issue with Parliament’s involvement in the matter and questioned why Parliament found it necessary to apologise to Ofori-Atta in this particular case when similar considerations were not extended to other individuals who have faced questionable treatment by security agencies.
He challenged whether the former Minister had any special immunity that warranted parliamentary scrutiny over his investigation.
Sory, drawing from his own experiences as a legal practitioner, emphasised the importance of allowing law enforcement agencies to carry out their work without unnecessary public commentary or political interference.
He urged all stakeholders to adhere to the principle of fairness, ensuring that every individual under investigation is given the opportunity to respond before any conclusions are drawn.
Read Thaddeus Sory's full opinion here.
Suggested:
Latest Stories
-
Akufo-Addo neutral in NPP flagbearer contest—Abu Jinapor
9 minutes -
NPA commends Tema Oil Refinery for swift return to full operation
11 minutes -
No 24-hour shift in 2020 – Ghana Publishing clarifies former MD’s claim
12 minutes -
Ghana U20 midfielder Hayford Adu-Boahen seals five-year deal with FC Ashdod
23 minutes -
Fuel prices set to go down marginally at pumps from January 16
29 minutes -
Measured diplomacy, not hot-headed statements, should guide Ghana’s foreign policy – Abu Jinapor
40 minutes -
Galamsey fight unsatisfactory – Abu Jinapor slams government
48 minutes -
We need to move away from religion and tribal politics – Abu Jinapor
55 minutes -
Iran judiciary denies plan to execute detained protester Erfan Soltani
1 hour -
Swiss bar employee who reportedly held sparkler unaware of dangers, family says
1 hour -
European military personnel arrive in Greenland as Trump says US needs island
1 hour -
Gushegu MP Alhassan Tampuli hands over rebuilt girls’ dormitory, expands scholarship scheme
1 hour -
UNESCO delegation pays working visit to GIFEC
2 hours -
Ministry of Communication and GIFEC support NACOC with ICT equipment
2 hours -
GIPC takes investment opportunity mapping roadshow to Central and Western Regions
2 hours
