Audio By Carbonatix
A lawyer at Lexkudoz Legal Consult, Veronica Frimpong says in property recovery and demolition, there is no need to seek additional order to remove existing structures on the property.
She explained that once the court has granted judgment and the order for recovery of possession the court is responsible for ensuring that all required documents, such as the writ of possession is filed, and proper notice is served.
According to the lawyer, the Supreme Court has stated that once all necessary processes have been followed and possession is recovered, the property legally belongs to the judgment creditor.
As such, there is no need for the new owner to seek an additional demolition permit from the Supreme Court but from the Municipal Assembly, the landed property is located.
“You have been given judgment to recover possession of the land because the land is yours. At least, after the court has assessed the evidence of both parties and has concluded and come to the determination that the land is supposed to be for party A who is the judgment creditor.”
“The court goes ahead to say, recover possession from the other party, the judgments debtor probably has possession because he is the one doing the construction on the property,” she said.
Mrs Frimpong highlighted that obtaining a court order for property recovery does not immediately grant possession.
She explained that the judgment creditor must follow specific procedures, such as filing an entry of judgment and a writ of possession, to claim the property legally.
Additionally, the legal practitioner said the process involves obtaining court permission, filing a notice of the writ of possession on occupants, and potentially notifying the police for assistance in physically claiming the property.
“There are processes that you will go through, you will get leave of the court. You file a notice of the writ of possession on persons who are occupations of the property. The law gives the processes that you have to go through.”
“I believe the Supreme Court is simply saying that you don’t need to come back to the court for further orders in order to deal with a property that has been declared to be yours and of which you have been asked to take possession of,” she said.
Latest Stories
-
Pursue Sedinam Tamakloe first before Ofori-Atta – Frank Davies accuses gov’t of double standards
49 seconds -
TUC, PUWU pushes back against ECG, NEDCo privatisation
2 minutes -
Prof. Opoku-Agyemang courts private sector support for Free Sanitary Pad Initiative
5 minutes -
Michael Carrick: Man Utd reach agreement with ex-midfielder to take over at Old Trafford until the summer
12 minutes -
I’ve not signed or cancelled any number plate contracts — DVLA Boss
25 minutes -
Offinso crash death toll rises to three
27 minutes -
BBC seeks dismissal of Trump’s $5bn defamation lawsuit
36 minutes -
We did international activations ahead of December in Ghana 2025 – Abeiku Aggrey
39 minutes -
‘Have GH¢100,000 or don’t wed’: Duncan-Williams slams lavish weddings
40 minutes -
Decision time for Trump on Iran but what does he ultimately want?
43 minutes -
‘They just kept killing’: Eyewitnesses describe deadly crackdown in Iran
44 minutes -
Armwrestling: Ghana confirmed to host 15th Africa Armwrestling Championship in April 2026
44 minutes -
Supreme Court defers ruling on Kpandai by-election to January 28
44 minutes -
IBF congratulates John Laryea on Continental Africa Featherweight triumph
48 minutes -
Ofori-Atta is embarrassing Ghana, says Martin Kpebu
54 minutes
