Audio By Carbonatix
QUESTION ONE: Is a consensus necessary for an amendment referendum? Of course, it is. The framers of the Constitution underscored the need for a consensus when they set those very high thresholds of participation (40% of qualified voters) and concurrence (75% of voter cast) for the amendment motion. Truth is, whoever you are, you can't achieve these thresholds unless you secure a consensus.
QUESTION TWO: Is a referendum necessary even if we already have a consensus? I think so. This is because you can't amend the Constitution by just securing a consensus. You need a referendum in addition to consensus in order to carry an amendment through. You don’t only need a consensus before you amend, you need a referendum even if you already have a consensus. Consensus is fundamental.
PROBLEM: So, the problem with the President's conduct is not exactly the reason he gave for withdrawing the bills. The problems with his conduct are at least three. The first is his tardiness, both in realizing that there was no consensus and in giving his address last night.
The second is his failure, either by refusal or negligence, to consult frankly, openly and widely on the amendments. Yes, there were some forms of consultation. But it is one thing having a consultation and entirely another consulting frankly, openly and widely. From the fallout, it is obvious that frankness and openness were scarce commodities in his consultation department.
The third problem is the President's stern unwillingness, even after all the education we have given with our private resources on the matter, to separate the issue of partisan local government (which the people don't want) from the issue of MMDCE elections (which the people want badly and which he himself did promise the people).
Why did the President withdraw the bill for the election of MMDCEs too? Obviously, that unwillingness to separate the two issues, which from the word go was exceptionally deceptive and set the project up for failure, is not for lack of understanding of the law. It is a posturing which smacks somehow of bad faith. Simply put - if you won't give me what I want, then, you won't get what you want. That’s not cool.
Da yie!
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
EC to review CI 127, introduce dedicated portal for election results
6 minutes -
Ho Assembly destroys expired food products seized from warehouses
12 minutes -
Over 1,000 NDC women petition A-G for Sedina’s release, Volta youth group backs call
24 minutes -
Most White Volta residents evacuated ahead of Bagre Dam spillage — NADMO
27 minutes -
La Nkwantanang-Madina MCE orders probe into alleged chemical ripening of fruits
32 minutes -
EOCO must name all persons linked to Berko bribery scheme — NPP communicator
34 minutes -
Prophet Emmanuel Adjei leads powerful prophetic encounters at ‘Born to Prophesy 2026’
40 minutes -
Bagre Dam spillage: NADMO secures temporary shelters for potential flood victims
41 minutes -
NALAG President charges assembly members to keep ‘eagle eye’ on public funds
43 minutes -
Mahama must probe $1.7bn GoldBod loss – Abena Osei-Asare
1 hour -
Ousted Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad sentenced to death in absentia
1 hour -
Assin Fosu court orders mental examination for woman accused of assaulting 10-year-old daughter
1 hour -
Vice President calls for sustainable livelihoods, stronger protection for Kayayei
1 hour -
Family, passengers injured in ghastly road crash at Ejisu
1 hour -
DMU 002 train repaired after colliding with goat near Ashaiman
2 hours