
Audio By Carbonatix
Former Ashanti Bekwai MP Joseph Osei Owusu says the credibility of the internal election process rested on one clear principle: agreed rules applied equally to all candidates in the upcoming NPP presidential primaries.
Speaking on Joy News’ PM Express on Wednesday, he said the process began with clarity, not improvisation. “First, we started with the rules. How are we going to play the game?” he said.
According to him, the rules were formally shared with every contestant. “We brought the rules, we distributed them to all the contestants, and we sat together with them,” he said.
He said that even those who could not attend in person were represented.
“Some appeared in person. Others sent their representatives. But we went through the rules together and agreed these are the rules we’ll play by,” he said.
That agreement, he noted, was critical to trust. “If I allow you to breach the rule without sanction, then I have not provided sufficient basis to be confident in me,” he said.
He said consistency followed from that point. Attention then shifted to the delegate register.
“There was a 2023 register, which at the conference we agreed will be used for this election,” he said.
But constitutional changes made updates unavoidable.
“At the same conference, we amended the Constitution to allow new entrants, people like me, who otherwise would not have been delegates, to become delegates,” he said.
That decision, he explained, required careful handling to avoid suspicion.
“So we had to compile the list and give confidence that nothing was being done to favour any candidate,” he said.
He said candidates were involved at every stage. “We invited them to participate at every stage of the compilation,” he said.
Verification, he added, happened openly at the constituency level. “Once people filled their forms, we sent groups to the constituencies,” he said.
“At verification, the constituency executives were there. The contestants’ agents were also there,” he said.
Disputes were not ignored. “Where there were disagreements, we didn’t let them die down. They were brought to us,” he said.
He said disputed cases were reviewed jointly. “We sat together with the representatives of the contestants and went through the controversies,” he said.
Outstanding issues were then handled by a smaller body. “We formed an in-house committee to investigate and report,” he said.
Latest Stories
-
Return to nature’s way of managing water to tackle flooding — GHIE
7 minutes -
Asantehene hosts Yagbonwura at Manhyia Palace
13 minutes -
South African government disputes Ghana’s claim on fatal shooting of Ghanaian national
33 minutes -
JoyNews partners NADMO to mobilise relief for flood victims
43 minutes -
Kwasi Pratt questions President’s helicopter tour of flood-hit areas, urges stronger ground engagement
58 minutes -
Flood victims to receive free psychological counselling as experts call for flexible work policies
1 hour -
NADMO says it warned of heavy rains and took steps to reduce flooding in Accra
1 hour -
Henry Quartey blames weak enforcement for worsening Accra floods
1 hour -
India asks WhatsApp to pause username feature rollout over fraud concerns
1 hour -
South African state complicit in xenophobic violence – Fiifi Boafo
1 hour -
NPP North East Regional Secretary declares bid for chairman position, says he’s tried and tested
2 hours -
Bus fares, rent, and school fees push Ghana’s inflation to 5.3% in June
2 hours -
WANEP urges stronger youth inclusion in West Africa’s political decision-making
2 hours -
GES debunks viral claim that floodwaters destroyed WASSCE papers
2 hours -
Mindful Governance brings Karl George MBE’s AI Wake-Up Call to Ghana’s boards
2 hours