
Audio By Carbonatix
Moody's has now agreed to pay $864 million as a penalty for failings in the ratings of securitised mortgage bonds in the run up to the American housing crisis. Our problem here being that this doesn't solve the basic economic problem we've got surrounding the ratings agencies. That problem being that someone, somewhere, needs to pay for them if we're actually going to have them.And the current system is that the bond issuer pays, not something we're very keen on really. For the pressures to offer a good rating as opposed to an honest one are increased here--he who pays the piper and all that. Our problem is that the alternatives are worse.“We’ve known for years that conflicts of interest at credit-rating firms were a significant factor in causing the 2008 financial crisis,” Senator Al Franken, a Minnesota Democrat, said when Moody’s announced that it expected to be sued. “We can’t let Wall Street be above the law,” he said.Franken has proposed doing away with the rating industry’s payment model, and in the writing of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act targeted the way that bond issuers pay for their own debt to be assessed. The Securities and Exchange Commission, in its consideration of reform proposals, ultimately decided to keep the same business model for the industry in place. Since then, complaints have persisted that ratings shopping is alive and well in mortgage- and asset-backed bond markets.Yes, but who else? The current news: “Moody’s has agreed to pay $864m to settle allegations that it inflated the credit ratings of subprime mortgage bonds that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, the Department of Justice said on Friday.”That's our basic problem with the industry structure: “The terms of the deal will see Moody’s pay a $437.5m fine to the Department of Justice, and the remaining $426.3m split between 21 US states and Washington DC.And the official announcement: "Moody’s failed to adhere to its own credit rating standards and fell short on its pledge of transparency in the run-up to the Great Recession," said Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General Bill Baer. "Today’s settlement contains not only a significant penalty and factual admissions of its conduct, but also a commitment by Moody’s to new and continued compliance measures designed to ensure the integrity of credit ratings going forward."
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Ghana secures US$250,000 World Gold Council grant to boost responsible small-scale mining
18 minutes -
Women, agents of change: My take from Vancouver Zonta Convention
27 minutes -
Ghanaian author’s cancer memoir added to Stanford University library, recognised by US Library of Congress
38 minutes -
MoMo and GhIPSS champion national development by digitising informal transport payments
44 minutes -
Telecel Ghana announces 2026 FESSP cohort to help close STEM’s gender gap
50 minutes -
GH¢4.2m deducted from National Service Personnel allowances for now-suspended training programme
58 minutes -
Telecel Ghana employees bridge ICT education gap in Asikuma
1 hour -
9 weeks after IMF exit, gov’t is back for $1bn in loans – Oppong Nkrumah questions fiscal strategy
1 hour -
Naa Amerley Bortei-Doku sworn in as Notary Public by Supreme Court
1 hour -
Overzealous police behind most offensive conduct arrests – NDC lawyer Victor Adawudu
1 hour -
NDC lawyer Victor Adawudu says speech-related prosecutions rarely go anywhere
2 hours -
False news publication law: Both NDC and NPP use arrests to energise their bases – Adawudu
2 hours -
‘Don’t rush to scrap it’ – Victor Adawudu defends criminal offensive conduct law
2 hours -
EU envoys meet to negotiate 21st Russia sanctions package
2 hours -
Actor Rebel Wilson did not defame colleague in social media posts, Australian court finds
3 hours