The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear Apple's bid to escape being found ​in contempt in its legal fight with "Fortnite" maker Epic Games after the iPhone maker ‌was deemed in violation of a judicial order mandating sweeping changes to its lucrative App Store in the antitrust litigation.

The justices took up Apple's appeal of a lower court's ruling upholding a decision by Oakland, California-based U.S. District Judge Yvonne ​Gonzalez Rogers finding Apple in contempt in Epic's 2020 lawsuit contesting App Store fees.

The Supreme ​Court is expected to hear the case in its next term, which begins in ⁠October.

The lawsuit by Cary, North Carolina-based Epic Games challenged Apple's control over in-app transactions on its iOS operating system and its restrictions on how apps are distributed to consumers.

Apple and Epic ​have clashed for years over the rules governing Apple's App Store. The contempt ruling and the scope of Apple's court-ordered obligations are the latest issues in the dispute to reach the Supreme Court. Apple has said the legal issues in ​the litigation will affect how millions of app purchases are made.

Cupertino, California-based Apple largely prevailed in Epic's lawsuit, but was required by a 2021 injunction issued by Rogers to allow developers to include links in their apps directing users to non-Apple payment methods.

Apple allowed the links but imposed new restrictions, including a 27% commission on developers for purchases made through payment systems outside the App Store within 7 days of clicking a link. Apple charges developers a 30% commission on purchases made in the App Store.

Epic argued that the new 27% commission flouted ​the earlier injunction. In 2025, ​Rogers found Apple in civil ⁠contempt for violating the injunction.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in December upheld the judge's contempt finding but let Apple make new arguments about ​what commission it should be allowed to charge for digital goods bought ​in apps distributed ⁠through the App Store but paid for using third-party systems.

That new effort has not yet begun in the Oakland district court.

Apple has denied violating the judge's order and argued before the Supreme Court that the injunction should not be applied to millions of developers beyond Epic Games.

"Regulators ​around the world are watching this case to determine what commission rate Apple may charge on covered purchases in huge markets ​outside the United States," Apple told the Supreme Court in a filing.