Audio By Carbonatix
Professor John Osae-Kwapong, Democracy and development fellow at the Centre for Democratic Development, Ghana (CDD-Ghana), has welcomed the Supreme Court’s order directing the Electoral Commission (EC) to suspend preparations for the Kpandai parliamentary election rerun, describing the intervention as a necessary step to avoid procedural complications.
Speaking on JoyNews’ AM Show, Professor Osae-Kwapong said the constitutional questions raised in the case made it appropriate for the apex court to step in.
“That borders on what a particular provision of the constitution means or does not mean, then it becomes only appropriate for the highest court of the land to step in,” he explained.
He applauded the court’s decision to put a temporary halt to the EC’s arrangements until all legal issues before it are resolved.
“I particularly like the directive to the EC to hold on until some of these key matters… have been resolved,” he said, noting that the court has scheduled the matter for determination in January.
Dr Osae-Kwapong argued that allowing the EC to proceed with a rerun. At the same time, the case is still being litigated could create a more complicated situation if the substantive ruling overturns the High Court’s earlier decision. He emphasised that certain actions, once taken, are difficult to reverse.
“There are certain actions that once done, to try and undo them will be a lot messier than if you wait,” he cautioned.
The Supreme Court’s directive follows an application challenging the Tamale High Court’s judgment that annulled the December 7, 2024, parliamentary election in Kpandai and ordered a rerun.
The applicant, NPP parliamentary candidate Matthew Nyindam, contends that the High Court assumed jurisdiction wrongly and is asking the Supreme Court to review and quash the decision.
Professor Osae-Kwapong noted that the issue touches on a long-standing legal debate about whether an appeal or a stay of execution automatically halts the actions of a constitutional body such as the EC. For now, however, he believes the court’s restraint will prevent unnecessary confusion.
“Whilst I had no expectations, I still appreciate the fact that the court has stepped in to put a pause on the rerun until some of these issues are resolved,” he said.
Latest Stories
-
Oil rises as US-Iran tension escalates after Iraq strikes, missile attack
47 minutes -
Trump says meetings with Zelensky and Netanyahu were positive
56 minutes -
Pressure mounts on Germany’s Merz after fractious reshuffle
1 hour -
Google rivals line up seeking damages after record $1 billion EU fine
1 hour -
Apple briefly tops $5 trillion market value for first time
1 hour -
Netflix edges BBC as first choice for UK viewers, Ofcom report shows
2 hours -
Idi Amin’s boxer grandson determined to become new King of Scotland
2 hours -
Mysterious deaths of 14 elephants in Kenya prompts urgent inquiry
2 hours -
Cynthia Erivo and Damson Idris among stars in Children of Blood and Bone trailer
2 hours -
Iran launches ‘attempted surprise attack’ on US forces in Middle East
2 hours -
Trump administration bans new Chinese humanoid robots
3 hours -
Pop star Madison Beer and NFL player Justin Herbert announce engagement
4 hours -
‘Don’t wait until you want revenge’ – why prenups are on the rise
4 hours -
Burnham has no scope to increase borrowing, think tank warns
4 hours -
eBay agrees $56m settlement with bloggers over harassment case
4 hours