Audio By Carbonatix
Member of Parliament (MP) for Bolgatanga East, Dr Dominic Ayine says the Asawase MP consulted him before taking a decision to retract bribery allegations leveled against a Supreme Court judge.
"I also serve as an advisor to Muntaka on many of these matters. I am deeply involved in this and I know what actually happened,” he said.
According to him, Mohammed-Mubarak Muntaka retracted the allegations leveled against a Supreme Court judge to preserve the cordial relationship between the judiciary and the legislature.
Speaking to JoyNews’ Samson Lardy Anyenini on Newsfile, Dr Ayine said the move by Mr. Muntaka after several consultations is meant to keep Ghana’s growing democracy intact.
“Our democracy is still fragile and we need to as much as possible ensure that it grows very well. Sometimes, when these things happen, you have institutions locking horns or personalities in institutions locking horns,” he said.
He indicated that should the Asawase MP have remained resolute and not retracted his accusations, several activities that would have led to proving such claims would “rupture the cordial relationship between the two arms of government.”
"The judiciary driving an MP to a committee hearing or contempt proceedings and so forth… Remember we are two coequal branches of government and the judiciary wouldn't have been able to say that Parliament should not make an enquiry into this.
“And if we were making an enquiry into this and it is a public enquiry, you'll find out that the two arms of government are at loggerheads and fighting each other,” he stated.
Although the former Deputy Attorney General believes the right thing has been done, he, however, said Mr. Muntaka should have made investigations into the matter before making his claims public.
Mr Mohammed-Mubarak Muntaka on February 6, in a press release retracted an allegation that a Justice of the Supreme Court tried to bribe a National Democratic Congress (NDC) Member of Parliament-elect (MP) to influence her in the election of a Speaker of Parliament.
He also apologised for any harm done to the image and reputation of the Lord Justices of the Supreme Court and members of the Judiciary.
“It is my fervent prayer that the existing historic cordial relations between the legislature and the judiciary will not be affected by this incident but will continue to grow in the interest of the country,” parts of the release sighted by JoyNews read.
Latest Stories
-
Asiedu Nketia has been touring since 2021, not plotting new campaign, says Dafeamekpor
44 minutes -
Apple, Google push for judicial oversight in Canada online safety bill
57 minutes -
Micron joins $1 trillion club as AI race powers memory chip boom
1 hour -
OpenAI’s Altman says AI unlikely to lead to ‘jobs apocalypse’
1 hour -
US Justice Department sues UCLA alleging antisemitic educational environment
1 hour -
US draws up plans to halt immigration, customs processing at ‘sanctuary city’ airports
2 hours -
US Justice Department seeks to lift injunction on ballroom project after shooting
2 hours -
Senegal’s ousted prime minister Sonko elected parliament speaker
2 hours -
Spotify launches ‘narrated articles’ from publications like The Atlantic, Vogue
4 hours -
Social media as bad for children as smoking, British doctors say
4 hours -
US Supreme Court won’t hear Meta’s challenge to Vermont social media addiction lawsuit
5 hours -
Show me where he said he wants to be flagbearer- Dafeamekpor defends Asiedu Nketia
5 hours -
Three busted and arraigned over SIM box fraud
5 hours -
Court grants bail to burglar captured on CCTV
5 hours -
Adu-Boahene Trial: Defence questions witness on bank transfers
5 hours