Audio By Carbonatix
Legal practitioner, Reindorf Twumasi Ankrah, has opined that the Supreme Court should not have heard the case involving Mr. James Gyakye Quayson that was brought before it.
According to him, since the Cape Coast High Court in its ruling declared the parliamentary elections in Assin North as null and void, Mr. Quayson ceased to be a Member of Parliament for that constituency.
"This issue surfaced in the High Court and the High Court relied on the certificate of renunciation which was evidence and said on the face of the certificate, he owed allegiance to Canada. At the time when they came to the Supreme Court, the man wasn't an MP."
Speaking on JoyNews' Newsfile on Saturday, he noted that "restraining him from doing that in my view is a bit of a stretch. Because if there is a substantive decision which says you are not an MP, then what are we restraining you from?"
If you admit that there was a decision of the High Court which states for a fact that the man is not an MP, then what you should have done was to direct them to enforce the decision against him. If we all agree that the High Court nullified his election, what was the essence of the Supreme Court action?" he asked.
In view of this, Mr. Twumasi Ankrah said, "the injunction restraining him is just an addition to a factual situation which was already there. In my view, Mr. Quayson, as it stands today is not an MP."
On Wednesday, April 13, in a majority 5-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Assin North MP can no longer perform parliamentary duties.
According to the Supreme Court, its ruling will be adhered to until the determination of the substantive case filed against Mr Quayson at the court.
A Cape Coast High Court in July, 2021 nullified the election of Assin North Constituency after it found out Mr. Quayson owed allegiance to Canada at the time of filing his nomination forms to contest the polls.
Mr. Quayson sought legal redress from the Supreme Court after the Court of Appeal in Cape Coast struck out an appeal he had filed challenging the ruling by the Cape Coast High Court.
Latest Stories
-
The Galamsey war and GWL’s fictitious and inaccurate rebuttal
9 minutes -
Afenyo-Markin demands answers over alleged GH¢22bn GoldBod loss
10 minutes -
GoldBod ‘Losses’: We’re not ignorant, we know our job – Afenyo-Markin
13 minutes -
GoldBod cannot hide behind agency role to escape accountability – Afenyo-Markin
24 minutes -
‘You don’t get to keep the fees and disown the costs’ – Afenyo-Markin challenges GoldBod
28 minutes -
GNPC turns 40, targets oil production recovery and $3.5bn fresh investment
38 minutes -
Minority will speak boldly on GoldBod losses despite attacks – Afenyo-Markin vows
43 minutes -
Moody’s upgrades EBID rating to B1, citing stronger finances and shareholder support
52 minutes -
GoldBod cannot make losses trading gold – Afenyo-Markin
60 minutes -
Papaye, KFC and Pizzaman customers among most targeted as TrustGH uncovers nearly 1,000 scam numbers cloning Google business profiles of major food chains
1 hour -
2026 U20 WWC: ‘We are in a tough group’ – Black Princesses’ Linda Owusu Ansah
1 hour -
2026 U20 WWC: Ghana’s Ambassador to Czech Republic welcomes Black Princesses to Poland
2 hours -
Oti NPP executives demand completion of stalled government projects
2 hours -
Jinapor demands answers as Alima Mahama is asked to pay for Embassy spending outside her tenure
2 hours -
Russia doubles scholarships for Ghanaian students to 240 annually
2 hours