Juventus' 15-point penalty over transfer dealings has been reversed.
Italy's highest sporting court says the case should be re-examined after Juve were accused of fixing balance sheets by artificial gains from transfers.
The lifting of the points deduction means Juventus move up from seventh to third in the Serie A table.
Rather than Juve being cleared, the case will now return to the Italian Football Federation appeals court, the body which gave the initial punishment.
As a result of the decision, with eight games to go in the season, AC Milan are knocked out of the Champions League places while Roma drop to fourth.
Tottenham managing director of football Fabio Paratici lost his appeal against a 30-month ban as part of the same proceedings.
The former Juve sporting director was one of 11 directors at the club, either former or still in place at the time of the ruling, who were sanctioned.
Paratici, former president Andrea Agnelli, former chief executive Maurizio Arrivabene and sports director Federico Cherubini had their appeals rejected.
Former player and director Pavel Nedved, Paolo Garimberti and Enrico Vellano were successful with their appeals.
Why were Juventus docked 15 points?
The Old Lady were handed a points deduction after an investigation into the club's past transfer dealings spanning two years from 2019 to 2021 by Italian football's governing body (FIGC).
Juventus were accused of fixing their balance sheets by artificial gains of around 60m euros from club transfers, charges they were found guilty of by the FIGC's appeals court in January.
The club, however, denied any wrongdoing and took their case to a tribunal at the Olympic Committee, Italy's highest sporting court.
The tribunal did not rule on the merits of the case but instead examined the legal legitimacy of the punishments handed out by the FIGC to the club and directors.
Juventus were among several Serie A clubs acquitted of suspect transfer activity by an FIGC appeals court trial last year but the investigation into the club was reopened due to new evidence from a separate criminal probe into their finances.
The 15-point sanction was tougher than the nine-point deduction prosecutors had requested.
Latest Stories
-
Government borrowing on domestic market too high; debt-to-GDP ratio of 82% challenging – IEA
2 mins -
Wanderlust Ghana gears up for 30,000 km road adventure
7 mins -
AFCON 2025Q: Joseph Paintsil out of Black Stars game against Niger
14 mins -
T-bills auction: Government target falls short again; interest rates up marginally
18 mins -
Colombia 2024: Black Princesses wrap up World Cup campaign with win over New Zealand
35 mins -
Today’s front pages: September 9,2024
38 mins -
Do you need the goals more than me? – Kudus quizzes Appiah Stadium
38 mins -
Adopt Songor salt development master plan to end bloodshed – Groups
46 mins -
Devtraco Plus launches Hotel at The Address – A new standard for luxury hospitality in Accra
2 hours -
Election 2024: Catholic Bishops’ Conference urges EC to uphold impartiality and adherence to law
2 hours -
‘Stop killing, raping us,’ Ayra Starr demands justice for slain uni student
3 hours -
Man stabs friend to death in Krachi Nchumuru
3 hours -
Businessman granted bail over alleged visa fraud
3 hours -
Resolve debt crisis before merging power entities – IES tells government
3 hours -
Police arrest man in Central Region shooting incident
4 hours