Audio By Carbonatix
It’s a universal truth that battery life on phones is bad.
Even with the giant batteries and external battery packs, we tote around, most modern smartphones struggle to make it through a full day of use, while the best devices barely scrape through two.
But it didn’t use to be this way: back in the (relatively) old days, phones had (relatively) fantastic battery life, lasting for multiple days at a time without needing to be charged. And, yes, our phones today are vastly more powerful than, say, a Nokia 3310, but why haven’t batteries kept up with the pace of progress?
According to Venkat Srinivasan, director of the Argonne Collaborative Center for Energy Storage Science and an expert in battery technology, the core of the issue is simple: Moore’s Law has simply outpaced battery technology, meaning that our phones have gotten better — and demanded more power — at a much faster rate than advancements in batteries have.
It’s not that there haven’t been any improvements: we’ve been able to steadily increase energy density over the past few years by shrinking down internal components. But according to Srinivasan, “Five years ago, it became clear we couldn’t remove any more things, there were fires. We’ve reached a stage where new improvements in energy density are going to come from changing battery materials, and new materials are always slower compared to what I would call engineering advances.”
That’s because today’s rechargeable batteries in phones are based on lithium cobalt, a battery technology we’ve been using since the early ‘90s, and we’ve largely reached the limit of how much power we can squeeze out of it. There is hope for the future. Researchers are already investigating new battery technology, like solid-state batteries, that could open the door to more energy-dense materials that could offer more power for future devices.
There is a catch, though: by the time those new batteries roll around, our phones may be even more advanced and need even more power, which could leave us right back with the same, one-day battery life that we started with.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
US accused of using illegal workers at centre processing refugee claims in South Africa
58 minutes -
Billionaire Jared Isaacman, an Elon Musk ally, confirmed as NASA chief
1 hour -
Susan Boyle ‘incredibly touched’ by Timothée Chalamet’s praise
1 hour -
Indian scientists predict how bird flu could spread to humans
2 hours -
Childhood friends find ‘$55,000 diamond’ in India
2 hours -
Heavy rains worsen conditions for displaced Gazans, UN warns
2 hours -
Venezuela denounces Trump’s order for ship blockade as ‘warmongering threats’
2 hours -
BP names new boss as current CEO leaves after less than two years
2 hours -
Dan Bongino stepping down as FBI deputy director
2 hours -
Bedwetting: Seven‑year‑old burned; guardian faces charges
3 hours -
Macclesfield forward McLeod dies in car accident
4 hours -
Newcastle to face Man City in EFL Cup semi-finals
4 hours -
‘Don’t put the President on the spot’ – Fifi Kwetey rebukes Majority leadership over OSP Bill
5 hours -
‘There is no conspiracy by NDC’ – Fifi Kwetey explains OSP Bill fallout after presidential intervention
5 hours -
Nigeria allege DR Congo ‘fraud’ as they hunt World Cup reprieve
6 hours
