
Audio By Carbonatix
It’s a universal truth that battery life on phones is bad.Even with the giant batteries and external battery packs, we tote around, most modern smartphones struggle to make it through a full day of use, while the best devices barely scrape through two.But it didn’t use to be this way: back in the (relatively) old days, phones had (relatively) fantastic battery life, lasting for multiple days at a time without needing to be charged. And, yes, our phones today are vastly more powerful than, say, a Nokia 3310, but why haven’t batteries kept up with the pace of progress?According to Venkat Srinivasan, director of the Argonne Collaborative Center for Energy Storage Science and an expert in battery technology, the core of the issue is simple: Moore’s Law has simply outpaced battery technology, meaning that our phones have gotten better — and demanded more power — at a much faster rate than advancements in batteries have.It’s not that there haven’t been any improvements: we’ve been able to steadily increase energy density over the past few years by shrinking down internal components. But according to Srinivasan, “Five years ago, it became clear we couldn’t remove any more things, there were fires. We’ve reached a stage where new improvements in energy density are going to come from changing battery materials, and new materials are always slower compared to what I would call engineering advances.”That’s because today’s rechargeable batteries in phones are based on lithium cobalt, a battery technology we’ve been using since the early ‘90s, and we’ve largely reached the limit of how much power we can squeeze out of it. There is hope for the future. Researchers are already investigating new battery technology, like solid-state batteries, that could open the door to more energy-dense materials that could offer more power for future devices.There is a catch, though: by the time those new batteries roll around, our phones may be even more advanced and need even more power, which could leave us right back with the same, one-day battery life that we started with.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Uganda’s military chief orders shutdown of two major media outlets
1 hour -
Two boys pulled from Venezuela earthquake rubble among 33 people rescued over weekend
1 hour -
Segun Arinze, Jerry Amilo react to fresh concerns about actor Hanks Anuku
5 hours -
Bad Bunny: Latin star lights up London with history-making stadium show
5 hours -
Fourteen killed in Saudi Arabia helicopter crash
5 hours -
Eleven killed after plane carrying skydivers crashes in eastern France
5 hours -
Europe’s heatwave linked to 1,300 deaths, WHO says, as Germany hits record 41.7 °C
5 hours -
Harry reconsiders bringing Meghan and children on UK trip
6 hours -
Canada score dramatic late winner to reach World Cup last 16
6 hours -
Tech firms are blaming AI for mega device and console price rises
6 hours -
Trump’s face is added to select US passports for America’s 250th birthday
6 hours -
Trump threatens 100% tariff on European nations over tech tax
6 hours -
Injured Raducanu withdraws from Wimbledon
6 hours -
Rice set for England start against DR Congo
7 hours -
Sunderland reject £8m Chelsea bid for Xhaka
7 hours