Audio By Carbonatix
A group calling itself Transparency and Accountability Forum says it suspects financial embezzlement in the afforestation project undertaken by the Savannah Accelerated Development Authority in which 20 percent of trees planted is said to have been destroyed by bush fire.
The project, worth 32 million Ghana cedis, was awarded to private firm Asongtaba.
Though officials at Asongtaba have hinted they will use their own resources to replant the burnt trees, the Transparency and Accountability Forum is describing the development as a clear case of financial loss to the state and is demanding an inquiry into the matter.
A member of the group - Saka Salia - told Joy News they will be compelled to go to court if SADA fails to provide satisfactory answers.
He wondered why officials of SADA and Asongtaba decided to plant the trees in the dry season when conditions were unfavorable.
“If because money has been given to you so you feel that there is nobody to check or somebody at the top is behind you so you plant trees in the dry season, you will fail,” he stated.
Saka said all persons involved in this deal must be hauled before court by the Attorney General and be prosecuted for gross negligence.
According to him, claims that five million trees had been planted were false.
He said the group has given the Attorney General two weeks to prosecute the case or they will proceed to court.
A member of Parliament’s Committee on Finance Alexander Kwamena Afenyo Markins also said the government, as well as SADA, breached Article 183 of the constitution by contracting loans for the project without parliamentary approval.
He accused SADA of failing to follow due process before entering into the joint venture agreement with Asongtaba.
Markins insisted there ought to have been a valuation of the Asongtaba project before SADA entered into the deal.
He said the contradictory information being provided by the Finance Ministry and officials of SADA does not help matters.
But James Afedzi who is also the Chairman of the Finance Committee said the controversy on the SADA-Asongtaba deal is needless.
He said people are making too much noise on an issue they know very little about.
According to him, SADA has not broken law by contracting loans without seeking parliamentary approval.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Trump administration unfreezes $600m for Gavi for global vaccine effort
6 minutes -
Oil prices slip as tankers continue to ply Middle East conflict zones
15 minutes -
OpenAI says its rogue AI tried to hack other companies
24 minutes -
Australia begins legal action against Telegram over alleged pro-terror material
33 minutes -
Red Cross declares crisis over blood supply shortage in US for second time its history
43 minutes -
Saudi Arabia’s dilemma as it tries to stay out of US-Iran war
51 minutes -
The Chinese robot army transforming the UK’s retail industry
60 minutes -
Trump considering AI controls after OpenAI hacking incidents
1 hour -
Meta shares fall as frustration grows over AI spending plans
1 hour -
‘No magic wand’ to tackle high prices, Fed boss says as US interest rates held
1 hour -
Anthony Fauci refuses to answer questions during tense US Senate hearing about Covid origins
3 hours -
Alexandrova collapses on court amid 34C heat
3 hours -
Wolves striker Arokodare joins Ajax on loan
3 hours -
Cucurella gets tattoo of Spain coach De la Fuente
3 hours -
Grealish misses Man City tour despite training return
3 hours