Audio By Carbonatix
The opposition National Democratic Congress has promised an overhaul of the justice delivery system once voted into power in December.
In a clearly outlined 'back-to-the-castle' manifesto, the NDC said it would empanel all Supreme Court judges on all cases, a position distinct from the current practice of allowing the chief justice the right to appoint judges to sit on cases.
It has also promised to separate the position of the Attorney General from that of the Minister of Justice.
Alex Segbefia, a member of the Atta Mills campaign team, in an interview with Joy News’ Kojo Oppong Nkrumah on the Super Morning show, said the policy initiative is to bring sanity in the judiciary and to ensure a fair administration of justice in the country.
But the move some legal practitioners say, smacks of direct executive interference in the activities of the judiciary, something Mr. Segbefia contests.
According to him, the initiative is rather to curb the unwarranted packing of the courts by the executive any time it lost a case in court.
Quoting the role of the Supreme Court which he said is to serve as an appellate body, give judicial interpretation, Mr. Segbefia reckoned the NDC will after consultations with the judiciary decide which cases to allow all judges to sit.
On how the NDC intends to implement the policies, he noted a referendum would be organised for Ghanaians to make their choice.
He maintained the perception of judicial bias would always remain irrespective of which government was in power.
But NDC’s position has fiercely been contested.
Mr. Ace Ankumah, a legal luminary, said the policy to allow all judges to sit “is not well thought out.”
He said empaneling all judges on a case will not augur well for the court, especially when a case goes for a review.
Under the current statutes, two new judges are introduced to sit on a case, when it goes for a judicial review, if the prosecution or defendant is not satisfied with judgements at the Supreme Court.
If all the judges sit on a particular case, what becomes of a judicial review, Ace Ankumah quizzed?
He said the authority to appoint was only vested in the Chief Justice and any attempt by the NDC to empanel all judges on a case was nothing but a clear interference in the judiciary.
Story by Nathan Gadugah
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
CSIDT proposes 80% of GH¢350m flood budget be invested in prevention
14 minutes -
Trump threatens to target Iran’s bridges and power plants if Hormuz attacks persist
51 minutes -
Ghana not yet in digital trust crisis, but warning signs are emerging – Kwami Tamakloe
55 minutes -
Digital trust crisis looming if fraud concerns are ignored – John Awuah warns
56 minutes -
Mamdani backs off pledge to arrest Netanyahu citing lack of authority
1 hour -
Banks’ NPLs drop to 16.1%, but credit risk remains key vulnerability
1 hour -
Business, consumer confidence positive – BoG
1 hour -
We don’t have a trust crisis – BoG urges vigilance against rising digital fraud
1 hour -
GIPC now an authority
1 hour -
Mahama urges African leaders to turn health pledges into concrete investments
2 hours -
NPP Greater Accra Regional Organiser hopeful touts experience, grassroots mobilisation record
2 hours -
WHO warns Africa risks losing decades of health gains as external funding declines
2 hours -
Chief of Staff plants shea tree at Jubilee House to reaffirm government’s commitment to shea industry development
3 hours -
GCB Bank unlocks new pathway to credit with Tier 3 pension-backed loan
3 hours -
Mid-Year Budget: ‘MoU is not a payslip’ – Oppong Nkrumah questions gov’t jobs, economic claims
3 hours