Audio By Carbonatix
The opposition National Democratic Congress has promised an overhaul of the justice delivery system once voted into power in December.
In a clearly outlined 'back-to-the-castle' manifesto, the NDC said it would empanel all Supreme Court judges on all cases, a position distinct from the current practice of allowing the chief justice the right to appoint judges to sit on cases.
It has also promised to separate the position of the Attorney General from that of the Minister of Justice.
Alex Segbefia, a member of the Atta Mills campaign team, in an interview with Joy News’ Kojo Oppong Nkrumah on the Super Morning show, said the policy initiative is to bring sanity in the judiciary and to ensure a fair administration of justice in the country.
But the move some legal practitioners say, smacks of direct executive interference in the activities of the judiciary, something Mr. Segbefia contests.
According to him, the initiative is rather to curb the unwarranted packing of the courts by the executive any time it lost a case in court.
Quoting the role of the Supreme Court which he said is to serve as an appellate body, give judicial interpretation, Mr. Segbefia reckoned the NDC will after consultations with the judiciary decide which cases to allow all judges to sit.
On how the NDC intends to implement the policies, he noted a referendum would be organised for Ghanaians to make their choice.
He maintained the perception of judicial bias would always remain irrespective of which government was in power.
But NDC’s position has fiercely been contested.
Mr. Ace Ankumah, a legal luminary, said the policy to allow all judges to sit “is not well thought out.”
He said empaneling all judges on a case will not augur well for the court, especially when a case goes for a review.
Under the current statutes, two new judges are introduced to sit on a case, when it goes for a judicial review, if the prosecution or defendant is not satisfied with judgements at the Supreme Court.
If all the judges sit on a particular case, what becomes of a judicial review, Ace Ankumah quizzed?
He said the authority to appoint was only vested in the Chief Justice and any attempt by the NDC to empanel all judges on a case was nothing but a clear interference in the judiciary.
Story by Nathan Gadugah
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Fuel, taxes and loans are driving up airfares – Prof Quartey
8 minutes -
Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire mark major border milestone with 37 new pillars
28 minutes -
Almost everything in Ghana is expensive – CUTS Director on airfare debate
38 minutes -
NAFCO builds GH¢100m food buffer as Ghana moves to strengthen food security
54 minutes -
Oil heads higher as US-Iran peace talks in stalemate
1 hour -
GAF sets Sept. 28–30 for Documentation, Body Selection Exercise
1 hour -
I resigned five months ago – BoG Governor Asiama explains GoldBod Board exit
2 hours -
Trump says men arrested at UK air base used by US were looking to do ‘big damage’
2 hours -
Trump confirms meeting with Anthropic’s Amodei, repeats dismissal of AI fears
2 hours -
China pushes back against US on Iran and Cuba in UN speech
2 hours -
OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs called to appear at Australian AI probe
3 hours -
No land is worth a human life – Sissala West MP mourns 2 dead in Buo-Tiwii clashes
5 hours -
GCAA explains why some prospective airlines fail to complete certification
5 hours -
WHO says Congo Ebola outbreak spreads to two new health zones
5 hours -
Nigeria come from benhind to win in AFCON 2027 qualifier
5 hours