Audio By Carbonatix
The “village palm wine tapper” and General Secretary of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Asiedu Nketia has debunked claims by the petitioner’s witness that polling stations are identified by serial numbers.
On May 13th, the importance of serial numbers as a security feature became a bone of contention between lead Counsel for the third respondent, Tsatsu Tsikata, and the petitioner’s witness, Dr. Mahammudu Bawumia.
Bawumia said serial numbers are not "decorations" on the pink sheet and that the Electoral Commission (EC) paid “good money” to go through tender in order to uniquely attach a serial number to a polling station code or name.
Bawumia said “The only number that comes embossed on the [pink sheet] is the serial number. It is the feature just as you have for cheques or passports. The serial number is a security feature and if you breach that, you compromise the elections”, he explained.
This morning however, Aseidu Nketia has responded to the claim by Dr Bawumia. He said Bawumia claim was not correct. He explained that the Electoral Commission and agents of political parties met before the 2012 general election and agreed on ways to identify polling station.
He said there were only two ways. They are the name of the polling station which was invariably related to the locality and code numbers of the polling station.
He explained that an “experienced” polling agent could identify the polling station by observing the code number.
He said Western region is identified by A, Ashanti region by “F” and Brong Ahafo region by “ G”. The next number on the code indicated district, followed by the particular constituency down to the polling station.
He was given an exhibit ID1 where he said by looking at the code number which was “F”, he was sure it was from the Ashanti region.
Mr Johnson Asiedu Nketia, who is representing both the first and third respondents is in the witness box testifying in the petition challenging the declaration of President John Dramani Mahama as the winner of the 2012 presidential election at the Supreme Court.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
CCMG calls for migration governance to be decentralised to district assemblies
47 seconds -
Unhappy Tottenham players should leave – De Zerbi
11 minutes -
Deputy A-G dismisses Miracles Aboagye’s claim EOCO never questioned him over GHC55m
13 minutes -
Female referee injured in melee during friendly
18 minutes -
Chiesa happy but wants new chapter at Liverpool
25 minutes -
Glasgow 2026: Nancy Bamfo, Adelaide Djabatey eliminated in women’s 54kg boxing
54 minutes -
Ghana’s construction ‘Gross Value Added’ to slow down in 2027, 2028 – Fitch Solutions
2 hours -
42-year-old man jailed 10 years for defiling 7-year-old boy in Wa
2 hours -
T-bills: Government exceeds target by 30%; interest rates decline again
3 hours -
Man jailed 10 years for defiling seven-year-old boy in Wa
3 hours -
Trump paused attacks on Iran to make space for talks, US ambassador says
3 hours -
NSMQ 2026 : Boa Amponsem SHTS makes light work of rivals to reach nationals
4 hours -
ORAL is still working and prosecuting corruption cases – Deputy AG
4 hours -
Adu-Boahene case is straightforward, not complex – Deputy AG
4 hours -
Deputy AG alleges ‘deliberate campaign’ to misrepresent Adu-Boahene prosecution
4 hours