Audio By Carbonatix
The Court of Appeal on Thursday upheld the decision of the Commercial Court to allow the state to introduce evidence of fraud in the payment of GHS 51.2 million to Alfred Woyome, a businessman.
Woyome had appealed against the Commercial Court's February 29, 2012 decision to allow the state to introduce evidence of fraud on the grounds that the trial judge erred in law in granting the state the permission almost two years after the state had filed suit to retrieve the money paid Woyome.
The state, on July 20, 2010, filed an application claiming that an agreement it reached with Woyome regarding the payment of 51.2 million was a mistake.
But according to Woyome, the state "went to sleep until January 16, 2012 when it filed a motion on leave to amend by substitution the amended writ of summons and the accompanying amended statement of claim"
In a unanimous decision on Thursday, the court presided over Justice S.E. Kanyoke, said the agreement reached with Woyome over the payment of GHS 51.2 million was not sacrosanct and could be set aside.
The Court held, among other things, that the amendment could be done once it was not going to bring injustice to the other party.
The Commercial Court Division of the East Track High Court, presided over by Ms Justice Barbara Ackah-Yensum, had on February 29, 2012, granted permission to the state to introduce allegations of fraud against Woyome and awarded costs of GHS 2,000 against the state for delaying the case.
Dissatisfaction with the Commercial Court's decision, Woyome filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal on March 13, 2012 challenging the decision of the Commercial Court to grant the state its request.
According to Woyome, the state could raise the issue of fraud but argued that it could not raise any other issue of relief which would reopen matters concluded in the consent judgement resulting in the payment of the GHS 51.2 million to him.
He said it was therefore wrong in law for the court to allow the state to reopen issues which had already been tackled in the consent judgement.
The Attorney-General, Marrieta Brew Appiah Opong, is currently in court seeking an order for the refund of the judgement debt of GHS 51,283,480.59 paid to Woyome because it was procured by fraudulent means.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Ghana’s fuel market is built for turbulence – NPA’s Edudzi Tamakloe explains why
1 hour -
Postponement not an option as Kenya races to be ready for Afcon 2027
2 hours -
ICE agent shoots and wounds man in Texas as locals demand answers
2 hours -
Ed Sheeran admits ‘mistakes’ at first show since Macklemore controversy
2 hours -
We are ready for the turbulence – NPA boss on Ghana’s fuel crisis
3 hours -
Lady I wanted serious relationship with said she’s not ready – Rema
3 hours -
I’ll never discuss my finances with man, even if he’s my husband – Nancy Isime
3 hours -
Wizkid, Wande Coal advised me on how to leave school for music – Davido
4 hours -
Senegal job an ‘absolute dream’ for new boss Vieira
4 hours -
Harry and Meghan’s media treatment echoes what happened to Diana, Earl Spencer tells BBC
4 hours -
Nvidia boss rejects AI extinction fears as ‘doomsday narratives’
4 hours -
Workers came across human remains – and unearthed a mass grave of 572 people
4 hours -
Each Jehovah’s Witness member now decides whether to accept or donate main blood components
4 hours -
Trump says US will form ‘AI Force’ and appoint an artificial intelligence tsar
5 hours -
Google’s Gemini AI hacked three companies in security test
5 hours