A federal judge on Thursday ruled that policies that make it harder for ‌people from countries on President Donald Trump's travel ban list to get green cards and work permits are discriminatory and unlawful.

U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick in Boston reached that conclusion, issuing a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit by around 200 people from 20 countries, including Iran, Haiti, Venezuela and Syria, who sued over a halt to the processing of their immigration-related applications.

The lawsuit, filed in December, took aim at policies U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services adopted beginning in November that affect applications by immigrants seeking asylum, green cards and work authorisation.

Those policies have resulted in the agency placing a hold on the processing of applications from people from the 39 countries subject to full or partial travel bans imposed by Trump, who has cited vetting and security concerns.

Before instituting that halt, the agency, which is overseen by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, adopted ​a policy in November 2025 that treats the nationality of people from those countries as a "significant negative ​factor" when reviewing their applications.

Kobick, who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden, concluded the plaintiffs were likely to succeed ‌in proving ⁠that the policy ran afoul of the Immigration and Nationality Act's bar against nationality-based discrimination.

The judge said the agency's subsequent halt on reviewing asylum and naturalisation applications was likewise "contrary to Congress’s command that the agency issue decisions on such applications."

She said the pause in reviewing green card and work authorisation applications violated the regulations governing them.

Kobick blocked USCIS from ​enforcing the policies against ⁠22 plaintiffs who had provided declarations detailing how they were harmed by them, and she directed the parties to discuss whether her order should apply to the ​rest of the 200.

DHS did not respond to a request for comment.

Jim Hacking, ​a lawyer ⁠for the plaintiffs, welcomed the ruling, which he said appeared to be the first by a judge nationally to address the "significant negative factor" policy alongside the separate but related hold on the processing of applications.

A handful ⁠of other ​judges have previously ruled against that halt in some migrants' cases.

"USCIS ​wants to make it harder for people to receive an immigration benefit if they are from one of the 39 countries, even ​though Congress has never allowed them to," he said.