Audio By Carbonatix
Apple has defended its decision to remove a number of parental control apps from the App Store, citing security concerns.
Several app-makers complained to the New York Times that Apple had taken their products off sale when it launched its own similar tools.
But Apple said the apps were removed because they "put users' privacy and security at risk".
It said the apps had been given time to make changes to meet Apple's rules.
The latest version of Apple's iOS mobile operating system added Screen Time tools, which let people see how much time they spend using their favourite apps.
The tools also let parents control how much time their children can spend on apps and websites.
Some app-makers claimed Apple had removed their products from the App Store after Screen Time was launched, and said it was trying to limit competition.
However, in a blog post, Apple said it had taken action against apps that were using "risky" Mobile Device Management (MDM) to control children's smartphones.
Many corporations and organisations use MDM to control what employees do on their phones. It lets businesses keep an eye on what staff are doing, and even wipe their phones remotely.
Apple said it was not appropriate for family-focused time management tools to use MDM.
"MDM gives a third party control and access over a device and its most sensitive information, including user location, app use, email accounts, camera permissions, and browsing history," Apple said in a blog.
"It is incredibly risky - and a clear violation of App Store policies - for a private, consumer-focused app business to install MDM control over a customer's device.
"Contrary to what The New York Times reported over the weekend, this isn't a matter of competition. It's a matter of security."
The company said it had given a number of affected apps 30 days to submit updated software that did not break its rules. It said many of the companies did make changes and were not removed.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Hon Thomas Kissiedu Okae aka Tommy Hugo/DC Okae
2 minutes -
A stitch in time saves nine: The cry of local businesses – It is now or never
6 minutes -
Mrs Stella Owusu Aouad
7 minutes -
How Ceejay’s Next Gospel Star became Ghana’s most purpose-driven talent factory
10 minutes -
Recovery on paper, doubt on the ground: BoG data shows Ghanaians still unsure despite major gains
11 minutes -
Tamale high court delays ruling in Anbariya vs. Technical University case
12 minutes -
Western Regional House of Chiefs inducts Shamamanhene as member
13 minutes -
GHAMRO distributes GH₵856,700 December royalties
14 minutes -
Black Queens are ‘doing extremely well’ – Björkegren on 2025 year review
15 minutes -
Act 1122 reshapes GSA as Prof Gyampo outlines tough discipline, cost reforms and 2026 priorities
20 minutes -
Ghana gets $10.5m for qualifying for World Cup 2026
21 minutes -
GHAMRO explains GH¢123.82 royalty payment to Fancy Gadam
22 minutes -
PPI for November 2025 falls to 12.3%
22 minutes -
Techiman police arrest 25 in major swoop; drugs seized
30 minutes -
Love in marriage goes beyond sex – Rev. Daniel Annan
30 minutes
