Audio By Carbonatix
Apple has defended its decision to remove a number of parental control apps from the App Store, citing security concerns.
Several app-makers complained to the New York Times that Apple had taken their products off sale when it launched its own similar tools.
But Apple said the apps were removed because they "put users' privacy and security at risk".
It said the apps had been given time to make changes to meet Apple's rules.
The latest version of Apple's iOS mobile operating system added Screen Time tools, which let people see how much time they spend using their favourite apps.
The tools also let parents control how much time their children can spend on apps and websites.
Some app-makers claimed Apple had removed their products from the App Store after Screen Time was launched, and said it was trying to limit competition.
However, in a blog post, Apple said it had taken action against apps that were using "risky" Mobile Device Management (MDM) to control children's smartphones.
Many corporations and organisations use MDM to control what employees do on their phones. It lets businesses keep an eye on what staff are doing, and even wipe their phones remotely.
Apple said it was not appropriate for family-focused time management tools to use MDM.
"MDM gives a third party control and access over a device and its most sensitive information, including user location, app use, email accounts, camera permissions, and browsing history," Apple said in a blog.
"It is incredibly risky - and a clear violation of App Store policies - for a private, consumer-focused app business to install MDM control over a customer's device.
"Contrary to what The New York Times reported over the weekend, this isn't a matter of competition. It's a matter of security."
The company said it had given a number of affected apps 30 days to submit updated software that did not break its rules. It said many of the companies did make changes and were not removed.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Stonebwoy set to fill OVO Arena Wembley on August 15 with BHIM Festival
4 minutes -
The African Union’s expanding footprint in strengthening cross-border tourism and trade unity in Africa
9 minutes -
Today’s Front pages: Tuesday, May 26, 2026
12 minutes -
Netanyahu vows to ‘increase the blows’ against Hezbollah as Israel intensifies strikes in LebanonÂ
21 minutes -
US strikes Iranian missile sites and boats near Strait of Hormuz amid peace talksÂ
27 minutes -
Why it’s time to change Ghana’s cocoa law
32 minutes -
Adamus Resources defends reputation amid renewed public scrutiny
36 minutes -
GN Savings and Loans could resume operations before end of 2026 — Dr Kweku Nduom
1 hour -
Telecel CEO speaks on closing Africa’s gender gap in technology at Rwandan summit
1 hour -
Analysis: Why the cedi is depreciating
2 hours -
What are they hiding? – Tech consultant questions rush for 15 digital bills
2 hours -
To nationalise or transform? Joy Business hosts roundtable on Ghana’s extractive future
2 hours -
This is not how modern innovation ecosystems are built – Tech analyst warns over NITA Bill
2 hours -
A web developer could become a criminal – NITA Bill sparks fear among young innovators
3 hours -
Mercy Johnson faces backlash over $18.24 menstrual kit
3 hours