Audio By Carbonatix
Apple has defended its decision to remove a number of parental control apps from the App Store, citing security concerns.
Several app-makers complained to the New York Times that Apple had taken their products off sale when it launched its own similar tools.
But Apple said the apps were removed because they "put users' privacy and security at risk".
It said the apps had been given time to make changes to meet Apple's rules.
The latest version of Apple's iOS mobile operating system added Screen Time tools, which let people see how much time they spend using their favourite apps.
The tools also let parents control how much time their children can spend on apps and websites.
Some app-makers claimed Apple had removed their products from the App Store after Screen Time was launched, and said it was trying to limit competition.
However, in a blog post, Apple said it had taken action against apps that were using "risky" Mobile Device Management (MDM) to control children's smartphones.
Many corporations and organisations use MDM to control what employees do on their phones. It lets businesses keep an eye on what staff are doing, and even wipe their phones remotely.
Apple said it was not appropriate for family-focused time management tools to use MDM.
"MDM gives a third party control and access over a device and its most sensitive information, including user location, app use, email accounts, camera permissions, and browsing history," Apple said in a blog.
"It is incredibly risky - and a clear violation of App Store policies - for a private, consumer-focused app business to install MDM control over a customer's device.
"Contrary to what The New York Times reported over the weekend, this isn't a matter of competition. It's a matter of security."
The company said it had given a number of affected apps 30 days to submit updated software that did not break its rules. It said many of the companies did make changes and were not removed.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Apologise and don’t do it again – Arthur Kennedy to Chief Justice over SOE comments
18 seconds -
Chief Justice remains committed to judicial independence, justice and equality – Judicial Service
33 minutes -
Ghana concludes evacuation of citizens from South Africa; total returnees reach 1,900 – Ablakwa
53 minutes -
Africa must define its own green transition path – Prof Fatima Denton
1 hour -
WASSCE 2026: English Language performance falls to 62.4% – WAEC
2 hours -
WASSCE 2026: Social Studies records sharp rebound as Maths, Science also improve
2 hours -
2026 WASSCE entry rises by 11% as 512,862 candidates sit exams
2 hours -
WASSCE 2026: English Language performance falls to 62.4% – WAEC
2 hours -
WAEC cancels 2026 WASSCE results of 8,295 candidates over examination irregularities
3 hours -
WAEC releases provisional 2026 WASSCE results for 512,862 candidates
3 hours -
CJ’s remarks on SOEs were made in good faith, not to undermine judicial independence – Judicial Service
6 hours -
Bright Future Alliance pays courtesy call on Akufo-Addo, invites him to African Leaders of Influence Lectureship Series
6 hours -
This is an attempt to break the Minority caucus – Patricia Appiagyei on alleged GH¢70k payment
7 hours -
‘OSP hasn’t contacted me’ – Patricia Appiagyei assures cooperation if invited
7 hours -
I find it strange that this memo was purportedly written by me – Patricia Appiagyei
7 hours