Audio By Carbonatix
Apple has defended its decision to remove a number of parental control apps from the App Store, citing security concerns.
Several app-makers complained to the New York Times that Apple had taken their products off sale when it launched its own similar tools.
But Apple said the apps were removed because they "put users' privacy and security at risk".
It said the apps had been given time to make changes to meet Apple's rules.
The latest version of Apple's iOS mobile operating system added Screen Time tools, which let people see how much time they spend using their favourite apps.
The tools also let parents control how much time their children can spend on apps and websites.
Some app-makers claimed Apple had removed their products from the App Store after Screen Time was launched, and said it was trying to limit competition.
However, in a blog post, Apple said it had taken action against apps that were using "risky" Mobile Device Management (MDM) to control children's smartphones.
Many corporations and organisations use MDM to control what employees do on their phones. It lets businesses keep an eye on what staff are doing, and even wipe their phones remotely.
Apple said it was not appropriate for family-focused time management tools to use MDM.
"MDM gives a third party control and access over a device and its most sensitive information, including user location, app use, email accounts, camera permissions, and browsing history," Apple said in a blog.
"It is incredibly risky - and a clear violation of App Store policies - for a private, consumer-focused app business to install MDM control over a customer's device.
"Contrary to what The New York Times reported over the weekend, this isn't a matter of competition. It's a matter of security."
The company said it had given a number of affected apps 30 days to submit updated software that did not break its rules. It said many of the companies did make changes and were not removed.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
2027 AFCONQ: Ghana under pressure as Gambia beat Somalia 2-1
3 minutes -
Eastern NPP Women’s Organiser calls on AG, Police to secure bail for Salomey Baffoe
5 minutes -
Poverty, illiteracy driving acceptance of vote-buying among women – Damongo Queen Mother
42 minutes -
Photos: Democracy Is Not For Sale forum in Savannah region
48 minutes -
GNFS launches 2026/27 National Anti-Bushfire campaign in Atebubu, records 62.8% reduction in bushfire cases
1 hour -
I’ll vote for a female president; women are less likely to steal from the state – Okyeame Kwame
1 hour -
More public education needed to stop vote-buying – Savannah Region MP
1 hour -
Absa Bank commissions new head office, commits to strengthening operations in Ghana
1 hour -
Republic Bank-JoyNews Habitat Fair clinic: Day 1 ends on positive note as patrons explore housing solutions at Junction Mall
1 hour -
Vanderpuye: NDC welfare system needed to support former officials, cadres
1 hour -
Chamber of Mines extends support to Akropong, Mampong Special Schools
1 hour -
Tumu chiefs, MP back clearance of road corridor for Ghana-Burkina road corridor
2 hours -
‘Democracy Is Not For Sale’: Monetisation of elections could lead to wrong people entering Parliament – UDS lecturer
2 hours -
COCOBOD increases cocoa producer price to GH¢42,400 for 2026/27 season
2 hours -
Atebubu College of Education receives GETFund boost after years of infrastructure neglect
2 hours