Audio By Carbonatix
KPMG has not renewed its sponsorship of the Duke of York's entrepreneurship initiative, Pitch@Palace.
The accountancy firm is thought to have made the decision at the end of October.
The controversy over the prince's ties to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is understood to have been one reason behind the decision.
The revelation follows Prince Andrew's appearance on BBC Newsnight in what critics called a "car-crash" interview.
In the interview, the Queen's third child said he still did not regret his friendship with US financier Epstein - who took his own life in August while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in the US.
The BBC has contacted Buckingham Palace for comment regarding KPMG's decision.
The accountancy and auditing firm - which is not the only company associated with Pitch@Palace - declined to comment.
The scheme was founded by the prince in 2014 and involves entrepreneurs competing for the chance to pitch their business ideas to influential business figures.
The project operates in 64 countries and claims to have created more than 6,300 jobs.
- Epstein's accusers 'failed by royalty'
- Six things we learned from Prince Andrew interview
- Who was Jeffrey Epstein?
Prince Andrew defended meeting Epstein after the financier was registered as a sex offender
In his BBC interview, Prince Andrew also "categorically" denied having any sexual contact with an American woman, who says she was forced to have sex with him aged 17. Virginia Giuffre - one of Epstein's accusers, previously known as Virginia Roberts - claimed she was forced to have sex with the prince three times. Responding to the allegation, the prince said: "I have no recollection of ever meeting this lady, none whatsoever." He added Ms Giuffre's account of him "profusely sweating" and "pouring with perspiration" when they danced at the club on the night in 2001 when she says they first had sex was impossible, because he had a medical condition preventing him from perspiring. People close to Prince Andrew said he wanted to address the issues head-on and did so with "honesty and humility" in speaking to Newsnight.'Precarious position'
Jonathan Turley, law professor at George Washington University, said it was "likely" the prince would receive a legal summons if he went to the US and lawyers representing alleged victims managed to access him. "There are a lot of these lawyers who would love to hand Prince Andrew a subpoena [an order to give evidence]," he told the BBC. But Prof Turley added the duke would have diplomatic immunity if he was in the US as part of a royal - rather than personal - engagement. "This interview [has] put him in a rather precarious position if he plans to visit the United States any time soon," he added. The prince has stood by his decision to speak out, but former Buckingham Palace press officer Dickie Arbiter described the interview as "excruciating". And BBC royal correspondent Jonny Dymond said the prince was "very damaged" by the interview, adding the attempt to clear his name had "failed, badly". A lawyer for several of Epstein's accusers described the interview as "sad" and "depressing". Spencer Kuvin, who represents several unnamed alleged victims, said "royalty has failed them". "The mere fact that he was friends with a convicted sex offender and chose to continue his relationship with him - it just shows a lack of acknowledgement of the breadth of what this man [Epstein] did to these girls," Mr Kuvin said. The prince said he visited Epstein in 2010, after he was released from jail, to tell him their friendship was over. He said that was the last contact he ever had with him.DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Innovative Teachers threatens legal action over exclusion from Collective Bargaining Agreement negotiations
48 seconds -
17-member committee formed to address concerns over Adipa landfill
4 minutes -
Team Volta wins NPA 2026 Staff Welfare Week Quiz
16 minutes -
Team Eternity Ghana releases new album “The Promise – Phase 1”
20 minutes -
Inside the human genome: Why scientists are still discovering who we are
23 minutes -
PAC grills Central Regional Coordinating Council over GH¢14.9m payments processed outside GIFMIS
31 minutes -
Ghana’s industrial dream at risk? How the Yuan policy could deepen China dependence
32 minutes -
Teachers’ strike: Government has funds, but processes are causing delays – Education Committee Vice Chair
38 minutes -
Afenyo-Markin urges Christian Council to intervene over arrests linked to free speech
38 minutes -
GCB Bank urges MSMEs to formalise businesses for easier access to finance
39 minutes -
Criminal cases must be tried in ordinary courts – Prof. Oquaye opposes tribunals
40 minutes -
Ghana, India sign MoUs to deepen cooperation in agriculture, healthcare, railways and ICT
1 hour -
Pete Edochie becomes first Pan-African honouree of Ghana’s Legacy Project
1 hour -
GCB MSME Caravan Clinic unfolds in Accra, boosting support for Ghanaian small businesses
1 hour -
AMA urged to crack down on unauthorised billboards in Accra
1 hour