Over the years, I've walked away from contracts more than once — not because the work wasn't there, but because of what was attached to it.

One was a drainage works project. Another was a hospital project. In both cases, the ask was the same: pay 10-20% upfront before the contract could move forward. Not a bonus after delivery. Not a share of profit. A toll, paid before a single shovel touches the ground.

This is the real engine behind why so much never gets finished in this country. It isn't phantom line items or padded budgets, though those exist too. It's simpler and more brutal than that: a chunk of every project's budget disappears before the project has even started, which means there's often not enough money left to actually complete the work.

I refused both times. The retaliation was quiet but effective. My certificate — the document needed to release payment for completed work — was hijacked. For six months, I was told the person authorized to sign it had traveled, or wasn't available, or some new excuse, a different story every single time. I knew exactly what was happening, because other contractors, the ones who'd paid, were getting their certificates signed and their payments released without delay. The message was never spoken out loud. It didn't need to be.

Eventually, I threatened to sue. Their response has stayed with me since: it would come to nothing, because everybody is doing it. Not denial. Not concern. Just a shrug, because the practice is so widespread that they assumed no court, no institution, and no public outcry could touch it.

And that's the part people miss. This isn't one corrupt minister or one bad administration. Some of the people running this system are civil servants — the same people who stay in place no matter which party wins an election. Governments change. Manifestos change. Campaign promises change. The 10-20%, and the quiet punishment for refusing to pay it, does not. It's one of the few truly non-partisan institutions in Ghana, and not the kind we should be proud of.

In one of those cases, I also watched someone else win a job after bidding $5 million higher than we did — not because his proposal was stronger, but because he'd paid into the right campaign coffers. And more recently, I've heard the practice has evolved further still: someone I know was offered a project on condition of paying $8 million upfront, with the option to take on five such projects if he could raise $40 million upfront. Not as a percentage. Not after delivery. Just to be allowed to build something Ghana needs.

This is the architecture of underdevelopment, and it's running right now, regardless of who holds power in Accra. It doesn't ask which party you support before it offers you the deal. It doesn't ask which party is in charge before it lets a drain go unbuilt, a hospital go unequipped, or a completed contractor's payment sit for six months over a manufactured excuse.

Here's what it costs beyond the money: it teaches an entire generation that merit is optional, that refusing to pay comes with a price of its own, and that the loudest anti-corruption rhetoric from any podium means very little if the civil servants underneath never change. Do that enough times, and you don't just lose a few contracts. You lose the belief that doing things right matters at all — and that belief is far harder to rebuild than any drain or hospital wing.

We keep waiting for a single dramatic scandal to wake the country up. But scandals fade. What doesn't fade is a culture — quiet, procedural, almost boring in how normal it's become — where saying "no" is treated as strange, and "everybody is doing it" is treated as a legitimate defense.

I said no, more than once. I paid for it with six months of manufactured delays and a threatened lawsuit that I was told would change nothing. Others are saying no right now, walking away from $40 million just to keep their conscience clean. I'd say no again.

The question isn't whether corruption exists in Ghana. Everyone already knows it does.

The question is: how many of us are willing to lose something in order to starve it, even when we're told it will change nothing?

Read Lumuel's article on Facebook

Credit: Lumuel Zerubbabel Baah / Facebook