Audio By Carbonatix
China says the scientist who claims to have created the world's first genetically edited babies last year acted illegally and in pursuit of fame and fortune, state media report.
Investigators say the researcher faces serious punishment after acting on his own and forging ethical review papers.
Professor He, who is reportedly under house arrest, has defended his work.
In November, he told a genome summit in Hong Kong he was "proud" of his gene-editing work, a practice which is banned in most countries, including China.
His announcement was met with condemnation from hundreds of Chinese and international scientists, who said any application of gene editing on human embryos for reproductive purposes was unethical.
What does China say?
Prof He's claims had not been verified, but investigators confirmed on Monday that his work had resulted in the birth of twin babies, and that another woman was currently pregnant.
Investigators from Guangdong provincial government said the doctor had raised his own funds, deliberately avoiding oversight.

He had also allegedly used technology of an uncertain safety level in order to carry out human embryo gene editing.
Investigators confirmed Prof He had recruited eight couples to participate in his experiment, resulting in two pregnancies.
They said baby twins nicknamed Lulu and Nana were born in November, and are under medical supervision.
Since Prof He's announcement of his experiment, he is said to have been placed under house arrest in Shenzhen.
What has the scientist claimed?
Speaking to the Human Genome Editing Summit at the University of Hong Kong, he said the girls had been "born normal and healthy" and they would be monitored over the next 18 years.
He said he had funded the experiment himself and confirmed his university, the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, had not been aware of it.
Prof He also explained that eight couples - comprised of HIV-positive fathers and HIV-negative mothers - had signed up voluntarily for the experiment.
One couple dropped out, but there was "another potential pregnancy" of a gene-edited embryo in its early stages.
He said his study had been submitted to a scientific journal for review, though he did not name the journal. He was also evasive about other details, including the names of "some experts" who, he said, had reviewed his work and offered feedback.
Latest Stories
-
Galamsey cuts off cocoa farms in Mfantseman, farmers suffer heavy losses
32 minutes -
Ghanaian delegation set for January 20, 2026 trip to Latvia in Nana Agyei case – Ablakwa
2 hours -
Accra turns white as Dîner en Blanc delivers night of elegance and culture
4 hours -
War-torn Myanmar voting in widely criticised ‘sham’ election
5 hours -
Justice by guesswork is dangerous – Constitution Review Chair calls for data-driven court reforms
6 hours -
Justice delayed is justice denied, the system is failing litigants – Constitution Review Chair
6 hours -
Reform without data is a gamble – Constitution Review Chair warns against rushing Supreme Court changes
6 hours -
Rich and voiceless: How Putin has kept Russia’s billionaires on side in the war against Ukraine
7 hours -
Cruise ship hits reef on first trip since leaving passenger on island
7 hours -
UK restricts DR Congo visas over migrant return policy
7 hours -
Attack on Kyiv shows ‘Russia doesn’t want peace’, Zelensky says
7 hours -
Two dead in 50-vehicle pile up on Japan highway
8 hours -
Fearing deportation, Hondurans in the US send more cash home than ever before
8 hours -
New York blanketed in snow, sparking travel chaos
8 hours -
Creative Canvas 2025: Documenting Ghana’s creative year beyond the noise
11 hours
