
Audio By Carbonatix
We’ve come along way looks-wise from our homo sapien ancestors. Between 800,000 and 200,000 years ago, for instance, rapid changes in Earth climate coincided with a tripling in the size of the human brain and skull, leading to a flattening of the face.But how might the physiological features of human beings change in the future, especially as new, wearable technology like Google Glass change the way we use our bodies and faces?Artist and researcher Nickolay Lamm has partnered with a computational geneticist to research and illustrate what we might look like 20,000 years in the future, as well as 60,000 years and 100,000 years out. His full, eye-popping illustrations are at the bottom of this post.Lamm says this is “one possible timeline,” where, thanks to zygotic genome engineering technology, our future selves would have the ability to control human biology and human evolution in much the same way we control electrons to power our world today. (For a critique of the scientific assumptions behind Lamm’s hypothesis, see this post by Forbes reporter Matthew Herper.)Lamm speaks of “wresting control” of the human form from natural evolution and bending human biology to suit our needs. The illustrations were inspired by conversations with Dr. Alan Kwan, who holds a PhD in computational genomics from Washington University, UPDATE: Lamm’s project was also sponsored by the website MyVoucherCodes.co.uk, where he has a blog.Kwan based his predictions on what living environments might look like in the future, climate and technological advancements. One of the big changes will be a larger forehead, Kwan predicts – a feature that has already expanding since the 14th and 16th centuries.Scientists writing in the British Dental Journal have suggested that skull-measurement comparisons from that time show modern-day people have less prominent facial features but higher foreheads, and Kwan expects the human head to trend larger to accommodate a larger brain.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
‘It doesn’t add up’ – Minority questions PURC’s tariff increase
45 minutes -
High Court affirms ICAG’s sole authority to regulate accountancy profession
1 hour -
A restored banking license difficult to resume operation; once collapsed ends its story
2 hours -
Kojo Mensa-Wilmot – a Molecular Biologist and Parasitologist
2 hours -
THE LAW 101: The burden of proof and the presumption of innocence – Lessons from London
2 hours -
UN says it will evacuate sailors stranded in Strait of Hormuz, as Rubio warns against tolls
2 hours -
Police arrest 186 suspects in major crackdown on human trafficking, organised crime in Ashanti Region
2 hours -
The Inconvenient Truth: Nations do not industrialise by accident—they industrialise by procurement design
2 hours -
Nandom Community Bank records GH₵81.8m asset growth as stakeholders rally for urgent recapitalisation
2 hours -
GIZ, Guinness Ghana sign MoU to boost sorghum output, target 30,000 farmers, 150 jobs in northern Ghana
3 hours -
Partey, Inaki Williams start as Queiroz makes four changes for England clash
3 hours -
LUV FACT-CHECK: NPP did not demand retraction from Kennedy Agyapong over Afari Hospital criticism
3 hours -
80 children, 1 room: Bugbelle gets room for hope
3 hours -
VRA warns public over recruitment scam, says it does not charge fees
3 hours -
Accra dons national colours as fans rally behind Black Stars ahead of England clash
3 hours