Audio By Carbonatix
Information Minister, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah has said that he cannot confirm if ‘galamsey’ kingpin, Aisha Huang, was escorted while being repatriated to China four years ago.
The Ofoase-Ayirebi lawmaker while confirming in an interview on Joy FM's Newsnight that Aisha Huang, was indeed repatriated to her country, said he currently “has no brief” which suggests that there was an escort on that journey.
The MP, nonetheless, indicated that his brief gives credence to the fact that Aisha Huang was sent back to her country.
“In the brief I have, those particulars are not available, I am not saying they are not available but in the brief I have, they are not.
“The brief I have gives me details of the flight, when it left Accra, when it got to its destination through transit to China with her aboard. That is the brief I have, that is the brief I will share with you and you can validate…in the brief I have, I do not have answers to questions about, was she escorted? How many people escorted her?,” he told Evans Mensah on Newsnight, Tuesday.
On September 12, 2022, the Ranking Member on Foreign Affairs Committee in Parliament alleged that ‘galamsey’ kingpin, Aisha Huang had no escort when she was deported in 2018.
Mr. Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa said Aisha Huang’s deportation was only a “shambolic attempt of a deportation” and a “charade” by the government.
Speaking on Top Story, Monday, he noted that due to the awkward manner of Aisha Huang’s deportation, the ‘galamsey’ kingpin could have absconded during her transit to China.
“This whole charade of deportation has gone down as the most shambolic attempted deportation ever in world affairs. Do you know that this deportation took place without an escort? There was no escort…She could have really absconded when they transited in Addis Ababa,” he said.
Meanwhile, speaking in the same interview, Mr. Kojo Oppong Nkrumah also clarified President Akufo-Addo’s comment about his uncertainty regarding how ‘galamsey’ kingpin, Aisha Huang, exited the country in 2018.
He said the President’s comment was a direct response to the particular question he was asked.
“The President was not speaking in a vacuum. There was a question about deportation and the President proceeded to respond that he is not too sure whether it is about deportation or whether she fled but then the substantive thing is this and then he proceeded to provide the substantive answer.
“I have heard several commentators suggest that there should have been more clarity in the President’s words etc. I mean in a democracy I am sure that we can always raise questions about the choice of words,” he explained on Tuesday.
Latest Stories
-
Russia killed opposition leader Alexei Navalny using dart frog toxin, UK says
2 hours -
Obama addresses racist video shared by Trump depicting him as an ape
2 hours -
Frank Davies slams Special Prosecutor as INTERPOL deletes Ofori-Atta Red Notice
3 hours -
Controller issues March 15 ultimatum for Ghana Card verification
5 hours -
Cocoa Crisis: Current challenges are self-inflicted — Oforikrom MP
6 hours -
Fuel prices set to surge as Cedi slides and global markets tighten
6 hours -
President Mahama honours August 6 helicopter crash widows with Valentine’s Day tribute
7 hours -
Vice President Naana Jane Opoku-Agyemang champions made-in-Ghana chocolates on Valentine’s Day
7 hours -
Six critically injured in gruesome head-on collision near Akrade
9 hours -
Gov’t to extradite foreign national who secretly filmed Ghanaian women to face prosecution – Sam George
9 hours -
U20 WWC: Black Princesses to play Uganda in final round of qualifiers
10 hours -
Burundi takes the helm as African Union declares ‘war’ on water scarcity
10 hours -
‘I will never forget you’ – Kennedy Agyapong thanks supporters, NPP delegates after primaries
11 hours -
Woman found dead in boyfriend’s room at Somanya
13 hours -
Woman feared dead after being swept away in Nima drain amid heavy rain
13 hours
