A member of the Council of State, Sam Okudzeto, has joined the chorus of voices calling on the government to reassess its lithium deal with Barari BV.

The former Ghana Bar Association president was emphatic that the current agreement is not in the best interest of Ghana.

Speaking at an Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) roundtable discussion, Okudzeto emphasised the importance of the public's opinion.

"This lithium agreement is not in the best interest of Ghana. That’s my view. And if you all agree with me, let’s all make a statement supporting the IEA to say that we do not think this agreement is in the interest of Ghana and that we have to relook this matter," he stated

He refrained from outright condemnation of Members of Parliament (MPs) but urged caution and advised them to act in the country's best interest.

Okudzeto's comments reflect the growing public discontent with the lithium deal, with many expressing concerns that it does not adequately address Ghana's long-term interests.

"Critics argue that the terms granted to Barari BV, including a low royalty rate and an extended exploration period, are excessively favourable.

Despite the government's defence of the deal, citing its potential for attracting investment and job creation, Okudzeto's intervention adds weight to the increasing calls for a review of the agreement.

In contrast, the Minister of Lands and Natural Resources, Samuel Abu Jinapor, remains steadfast in insisting that the lithium deal with Atlantic Lithium of Australia is the best mining lease for Ghana.

Mr Jinapor argues that the government will receive 13 per cent in royalties with a 30 per cent stake in Atlantic Lithium, positioning it favourably compared to other mineral agreements.

The minister emphasized the strategic importance of the deal, stating that it aligns with the government's policy on the management, exploitation, and utilisation of green minerals, including lithium, in the country's best interests.