
Audio By Carbonatix
New York's highest court on Tuesday ruled that employers' health insurance plans have to cover medically necessary abortions, rejecting a lawsuit by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany claiming that the law's exemption for religious employers was too narrow.
The New York Court of Appeals found that the rule, passed in 2017 by the state's Department of Financial Services (DFS), did not violate religious employers' freedom because both the rule and its religious exemption were neutral and generally applicable to all employers.
The 2017 rule was made into law by the state legislature in 2022, though the law was not challenged in the lawsuit.
"We continue to believe that the regulatory action by the state, as well as subsequent legislative action, requiring religious organizations to provide and pay for coverage of abortion in its employee health plans is unconstitutional and unjust," Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, said in a statement. He said the Diocese would appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"DFS's actions have ensured that women in New York have control over their reproductive choices, and that insurers cover abortions and contraceptives with no copayments, deductibles or any out-of-pocket costs," DFS Superintendent Adrienne Harris said in a statement.
The religious exemption in the rule applies to non-profit entities whose primary purpose is the "inculcation of religious values" and that primarily employ and serve people who share its religious beliefs.
The Diocese alleged that this exemption was too narrow because it would not include religious organizations with a broader purpose than inculcating religious values, such as serving the poor, or that employed or served a large number of people who did not share their religion.
The Court of Appeals previously rejected the diocese's challenge in 2020, citing an earlier case upholding a contraception coverage requirement with a similar religious exemption.
In June 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Philadelphia could not refuse to place foster children with a Catholic agency that turned away same-sex couples as would-be foster parents. It then ordered the New York court to reconsider the abortion coverage case in light of that ruling.
The court said in Tuesday's decision that the Supreme Court's ruling did not change the outcome because it was narrowly focused on the facts of that case, and did not overturn the longstanding precedent that neutral, generally applicable laws can sometimes restrict religious expression.
Republican-led states have banned or restricted abortion in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling eliminating a nationwide right to abortion. Democratic states have moved to safeguard and expand abortion access.
Latest Stories
-
CGI orders motorbike training at tactical school in Kyebi
50 minutes -
Sachet water producers in Berekum defy gov’t directives, increase prices
51 minutes -
Critical commodities stuck at port, CSOs warn of family planning crisis
53 minutes -
Gender Ministry mourns victims of Volta Lake boat tragedy, deploys support for affected families
55 minutes -
MPs undergo training on human trafficking and gender dimensions
56 minutes -
Don’t expect instant relief – COMAC CEO warns fuel price drops will be gradual
58 minutes -
GIS to unveil comprehensive plans to enhance officers’ welfare and infrastructure
1 hour -
Right move, wrong timing? – COMAC CEO questions govt’s delay on fuel price relief
1 hour -
IMF urges Central Banks to keep inflation in check
2 hours -
NRSA stands firm on Toyota Voxy ban despite transport operators’ opposition
2 hours -
H. Kwasi Prempeh raises concerns over Supreme Court’s handling of OSP constitutionality case
2 hours -
Global childhood cancer cases soar
2 hours -
Airline pilots fear retribution over refusing to fly in Middle East, aviators’ group says
2 hours -
Police intensify security in Bosomtwe communities after deadly clash
2 hours -
Corporate Income Tax contributes highest to 2025 petroleum revenue
2 hours