Audio By Carbonatix
Lawyer and Member of Parliament for Manhyia South, Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, has called for restraint in any attempt to remove the Chief Justice, stressing the importance of protecting the judiciary from political interference.
His comments follow a press briefing by the New Patriotic Party (NPP) on Wednesday, during which the party urged judges to resist any attempt to unlawfully remove the Chief Justice.
Speaking on JoyNews, Mr Awuah urged all stakeholders, particularly those in authority, to tread carefully when dealing with matters concerning the judiciary, especially the office of the Chief Justice. He noted that the judiciary is a crucial arm of government meant to be non-partisan and impartial.
"When it comes to matters of the judiciary, they are supposed to stand in the middle and hold the scale balanced," he said. "We must all ensure that this independence is maintained and not undermined, either through politicisation or intimidation."
Mr Awuah acknowledged that the President does have constitutional power to act on petitions against the Chief Justice. However, he warned that such power must be exercised with great caution.
“It’s true the Constitution allows the President to act on a petition, but it is not a decision to be taken lightly. If care is not taken, the judiciary will become a subsidiary of the executive where judges will labour under the fear of being removed from office. If that happens, we are all in trouble,” he explained.
The MP also raised concerns about the vague nature of some of the constitutional grounds for removing a Chief Justice, particularly the term “stated misbehaviour.”
“To me, respectfully is very ambiguous because it does not give specify what amounts to stated behaviour. And so it for the council of state together with the president to come to a decision as to whether firstly a particular petition satisfy the ground of stated misbehavior, if that is the ground. And secondly if a prima facie charge has been established in respect of it," he said.
Mr Awuah urged all right-thinking members of society to insist on due process and caution, especially when the grounds for removal may not be strong enough.
“All we are saying is that if there aren’t very serious grounds, let’s tread with caution,” he added.
Latest Stories
-
Accra turns white as Dîner en Blanc delivers night of elegance and culture
1 hour -
War-torn Myanmar voting in widely criticised ‘sham’ election
3 hours -
Justice by guesswork is dangerous – Constitution Review Chair calls for data-driven court reforms
3 hours -
Justice delayed is justice denied, the system is failing litigants – Constitution Review Chair
3 hours -
Reform without data is a gamble – Constitution Review Chair warns against rushing Supreme Court changes
4 hours -
Rich and voiceless: How Putin has kept Russia’s billionaires on side in the war against Ukraine
4 hours -
Cruise ship hits reef on first trip since leaving passenger on island
4 hours -
UK restricts DR Congo visas over migrant return policy
5 hours -
Attack on Kyiv shows ‘Russia doesn’t want peace’, Zelensky says
5 hours -
Two dead in 50-vehicle pile up on Japan highway
5 hours -
Fearing deportation, Hondurans in the US send more cash home than ever before
5 hours -
New York blanketed in snow, sparking travel chaos
5 hours -
Creative Canvas 2025: Documenting Ghana’s creative year beyond the noise
9 hours -
We would have lost that game last season – Guardiola
9 hours -
Nigeria reach AFCON last 16 despite Tunisia fightback
9 hours
