Audio By Carbonatix
A rumour that Facebook users' private messages were appearing on public timelines is false, the firm has said.
Some users, mostly in France, reported that "private messages" sent between 2007-2009 were suddenly public.
However, Facebook told the BBC: "[The] messages were older wall posts that had always been visible on the users' profile pages.
Separately, Facebook shares fell up to 11% after an influential journal said the stock is worth just $15.
On the messaging rumour, the social network said: "Facebook is satisfied that there has been no breach of user privacy."
Another source at the company told the BBC that engineers said there was "no way" the two areas of data could get mixed up.
Private material
The source said that "no mechanism" had ever been created that would allow a private message to be published onto a user's wall or timeline.
Similar rumours surfaced and were investigated in 2011, the source said, but after "extensive investigation" they were proven to be untrue.
Despite Facebook's statement, many users reported finding what they believed to be old private material.
"There are messages I've got on my wall that are most definitely private messages! From 2006 all the way up to 2012," wrote Poppy Dinsey, owner of fashion social network What I Wore Today.
"I'm 100% sure by content and from memory. And also some posts on my wall were clearly beginnings of (private) group [messages]."
Meanwhile, Facebook shares were under pressure after the US financial publication Barron's said the stock is worth perhaps only $15 a share, well below the $38-a-share flotation price.
On Wall Street, the shares ended down 9.1% to $20.79, having fallen more than 11% earlier in the day.
Barron's said: "Facebook's 40% plunge from its initial public offering price of $38 in May has millions of investors asking a single question: Is the stock a buy?
"The short answer is 'No.' What are the shares worth? Perhaps only $15," Barron's said.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
NADMO dismisses claims residents were not warned before Weija Dam spillage
1 hour -
Government begins payment of 2020 batch of nurses and midwives arrears
1 hour -
Controversial anti-LGBTQ bill presented to Parliament for second reading
1 hour -
Deloitte Partner urges clear, consistent policies to govern mining license renewals, local content
2 hours -
Xenophobic attacks: Ghana must pursue justice for victims beyond evacuation – Bosome Freho MP
2 hours -
BOPP positions sustainable agribusiness as investment frontier
2 hours -
Ga Mantse demands action against chiefs selling lands on waterways
2 hours -
South African Tourism condemns anti-immigrant attacks, reassures African travellers
2 hours -
APSU 2002 Year Group announces key leadership appointments for 97th anniversary hosting & BOLT Steering Committee
2 hours -
Government backs hybrid model for Ghana’s extractive sector, rejects move to shut out foreign investors
2 hours -
LMWG commends Heath Goldfields on 5-year community development plan for Prestea
2 hours -
Eswatini champions SiSwati stories in digital age at World Book Day 2026
3 hours -
Only weak men forgive cheating partner – Yul Edochie
3 hours -
Meta repeatedly snubs EU body over Facebook and Instagram user bans
3 hours -
Family wealth should be viewed as asset class for building transgenerational enterprises – Alex Dadey
3 hours