Audio By Carbonatix
Vice Chair of the Subsidiary Legislation Committee and Member of Parliament’s Constitutional and Legal Affairs Committee, Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, has raised concerns over the Attorney-General’s decision to take over cases from the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP), following a recent High Court ruling on prosecutorial authority.
Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile, he noted that while the court’s decision is binding, its practical implication is that the OSP cannot prosecute without authorisation from the Attorney-General, commonly referred to as a fiat.
However, he questioned the Attorney-General’s immediate move to assume control of ongoing cases instead of granting the OSP authorisation to continue its work.
“All that is required to cure the situation is to give the OSP the fiat. But instead, the reaction has been to take over the cases—cases the OSP has investigated and understands better,” he argued.
According to the Manhyia South MP, the development raises concerns over efficiency and continuity, particularly as many of the cases are already at advanced stages.
“When an institution has investigated and is already prosecuting cases, it is better placed to continue. Taking over midway raises questions about restarting processes and possible delays,” he added.
He further noted that significant state resources have been invested in the OSP, arguing that allowing the office to complete its prosecutions would be more practical than shifting responsibility to another institution already managing its own caseload.
He also suggested that the decision cannot be divorced from long-standing tensions between the OSP and sections of the political establishment, particularly following high-profile investigations.
“There is a history here. Attempts have been made in the past to weaken or even abolish the office. When such actions are viewed together, it raises legitimate concerns about intent,” he said.
He stressed the need for a clear transitional framework to guide the implementation of the court’s ruling, questioning the process for managing ongoing prosecutions.
“In every situation like this, there must be a transition plan. If the OSP is to seek fiat, then what is the process? What happens to cases already in progress?” he asked.
Latest Stories
-
An anti-corruption Office should not be controlled by government — Mary Addah
1 hour -
We’ve made gains despite imperfect OSP structure — Mary Addah
1 hour -
AG’s takeover of OSP cases raises questions over motive, strategy — Baffour Awuah
1 hour -
High Court had jurisdiction in OSP ruling; judge acted boldly — Adawudu
2 hours -
OSP prosecutorial power controversy was settled before law was passed — Kofi Bentil
2 hours -
Constitutional interpretation in OSP ruling was outside High Court’s jurisdiction — Baffour Awuah
2 hours -
High Court ruling on OSP was a bad decision — Kofi Bentil
2 hours -
U17 Women’s WCQ: Black Maidens ready to ‘finish the job’ against Togo – Joe Darkwah
3 hours -
‘Unprincipled actors’ at centre of OSP–AG case Dr Bomfeh
3 hours -
OSP–AG legal clash reflects institutional governance problems — Dr Bomfeh
3 hours -
President Mahama kicks off Northern region tour to deepen citizen engagement
3 hours -
FA Cup: Simpson reveals Nations FC’s Africa dream after Aduana victory
4 hours -
Man found dead in bush near DZOSEC; Police launch investigation
4 hours -
‘Score one, I’ll die for the team’ – Simpson reveals conversation with Annor before Aduana victory
5 hours -
CFAO Mobility pledges “full cooperation” with DVLA following vehicle impoundment scandal
5 hours