Audio By Carbonatix
A U.S. judge on Tuesday rejected Huawei Technologies' bid to dismiss most of a federal indictment accusing the Chinese telecommunications company of trying to steal technology secrets from U.S. rivals, and misleading banks about its work in Iran.
In a 52-page decision, U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly in Brooklyn found sufficient allegations in the 16-count indictment that Huawei engaged in racketeering to expand its brand, stole trade secrets from six companies, and committed bank fraud.
The Iran accusations stemmed from Huawei's alleged control of Skycom, a Hong Kong company that did business in that country.
Donnelly said prosecutors satisfactorily alleged Skycom "operated as Huawei's Iranian subsidiary and ultimately stood to benefit, in a roundabout way," from more than $100 million of money transfers through the U.S. financial system.
Huawei has pleaded not guilty and had sought to dismiss 13 of the 16 counts, calling itself "a prosecutorial target in search of a crime."
A trial is scheduled for May 4, 2026, and could last several months.
Neither Huawei nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Interim U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella in Brooklyn declined to comment.
The criminal case began during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term in 2018, the same year the Department of Justice launched its China Initiative to address Beijing's alleged theft of intellectual property.
Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou, whose father founded the company, had been a defendant, and was detained in Canada for nearly three years before being allowed to return to China. Charges against her were dismissed in 2022.
In 2022, President Joe Biden's administration scrapped the China Initiative, after critics said it amounted to racial profiling and caused fear that chilled scientific research.
Based in Shenzhen, Huawei operates in more than 170 countries and has about 208,000 employees.
The U.S. government has restricted Huawei's access to American technology since 2019, citing national security concerns. Huawei denies it is a threat.
The case is U.S. v. Huawei Technologies Co et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No. 18-cr-00457.
Latest Stories
-
Frimpong-Boateng proposes Environmental Restoration Fund funded by mineral royalties
5 minutes -
Corrupt individuals are worse than pathogens; their actions cause premature deaths – Prof Frimpong-Boateng
10 minutes -
No illegal mining operation will find refuge on Akyem Essase lands — Chief declares
14 minutes -
Flight price rises due to ‘foolish leaders’ starting wars, Virgin’s Branson says
21 minutes -
Consult traditional authorities before granting mining concessions on stool lands — Baffour Sikabede to gov’t
32 minutes -
Why are European countries moving their gold out of North America?
37 minutes -
Galamsey: Chiefs must not trade rivers for mining royalties – Baffour Sikabede
42 minutes -
Jamaica to bring slavery reparations petition to King Charles
53 minutes -
UEW holds Fourth Annual Colloquium on politics and Ghana’s environmental future
57 minutes -
2026 U-20 WWC: Black Princesses fall to Ecuador in opening game
3 hours -
GPL 2026/27: Hearts of Oak start new season with emphatic win over Berekum Chelsea
4 hours -
GPL 2026/27: Asante Kotoko held by debutants Debibi United in four-goal thriller
4 hours -
CAF CL: Medeama suffer home defeat in first leg against TP Mazembe
4 hours -
GPL 2026/27: Samartex secure 3-1 victory over Karela in season opener
5 hours -
Kumawu MP calls for urgent action on SHS infrastructure deficits
5 hours