Audio By Carbonatix
The recently introduced Value Added Tax (VAT) on banking services may be a European Union (EU) prescription to Ghana on how it can make up for expected revenue losses after the country signs the controversial Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA).
This was contained in a 2007 report by Realizing Rights, an international NGO and cited by myjoyonline.com.
The report is titled Economic Partnership Agreements between the EU and African Countries: Potential Development Implications for Ghana.
The report states: "the EU has recognised that African countries are likely to face revenue losses from tariff elimination, but has argued these ought to be considered ‘short-term adjustment costs’ which can be overcome through re-structuring and broadening domestic tax bases".
There was public anxiety after it surfaced two weeks ago, government will be charging banks a 17.5% Value Added Tax on the fees they take for providing financial services. Many thought it meant government was putting a levy on savings and salaries paid through the banks.
But government has clarified, the new VAT Act, Act 870 will affect only non-core financial services such as data processing, legal, accounting, actuarial, notary and consulting services.
The VAT on financial services will not to be charged on salaries, savings, deposits, investments, interests or loans.
It is expected to take effect from June 1,2014 after intensive public education.
But government may just be complying with an EU prescription, says the report by Realizing Rights.
Ghana is widely expected to sign the EPA.
According to the report, Ghana and other African countries are being encouraged by the EU to use VAT to raise revenue.
35% of all Ghana's imports in 2005 for instance were from the EU alone. The EU has asked Ghana to remove as much as 80% of its tariff on these imports -- this is part of the EU-initiated EPAs.
This means Ghana will lose much-needed revenue for development.
The report estimates that the impact of EPA liberalization on Ghana would result in the potential loss of about $90 million in government revenue.
Other reports have also suggested government would lose $1 out of every $5 dollars it spends.
If the government is unable to offset these financial losses, this could lead to possible cuts in public expenditure in
important areas, such as health and education.
The Realising Rights report, states that in view of these losses should the EPA be signed, "the favoured EU prescription is for African countries to switch from trade taxes to levying a VAT".
Ghana begun charging VAT since 1998.
Latest Stories
-
Why Gordon Asare Bediako matters for NPP 2028’s communication
2 minutes -
UPSA hosts 11th Business & Entrepreneurship Conference on ESG and Sustainability
13 minutes -
Strong public confidence boosts Ghana’s drive towards local vaccine production
33 minutes -
Strategy Execution for Results
40 minutes -
Teens need to press pause on late-night doomscrolling
40 minutes -
PIAC probes delayed Ehi–Dzodze road project amid concerns over oil revenue use
42 minutes -
Amb. Dr Samuel Ben Owusu calls for urgent action on Ghana’s water security
57 minutes -
Pan Africa AU Agenda 2063 Mission, IAWPA hold Africa Day Leadership Summit in Accra
60 minutes -
Akatsi North MP calls for more teacher recruitment as district commissions new projects
1 hour -
Paternity Fraud Laws in Ghana: A balanced alternative to Compulsory Paternity Testing at Birth
1 hour -
Flooding in Accra: Over 30 Years of Doing Nothing
2 hours -
TI Ghana, GIPC intensify media campaign against fronting in business sector
2 hours -
“I suffered beatings, look at my marks” – Evacuated Ghanaian recounts alleged xenophobic attack in South Africa
2 hours -
Afanyi Dadzie Writes: Xenophobia, illegal migration and the hard truths we must face as Ghanaians
2 hours -
The NPP can only secure victory in 2028 with the right leadership choices at every level of the party
3 hours