
Audio By Carbonatix
The Ghana Exim Bank says a publication in the Herald, a local newspaper, about some missing GHS 33 million at the institution is false.
In a rejoinder to the publication that appeared in the Friday, June 28 to June 30 edition of the newspaper, Management of the bank said the publication was “malicious, mischievous and misleading and has no factual basis and it is only intended to bring the hard-won reputation of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr Lawrence Agyisam and the Bank into disrepute.”
“No GHS 33 million is or has been missing from the accounts of the GHANA EXIM BANK between the stated period of the said audit carried out at the Ghana Export Promotion Authority by the Auditor General Dept,” the Ghana Exim Bank said in the rejoinder dated June 28, 2019.
”In your said report, you stated amongst others that, “GEPA received a total of GHS32,949,957.57 from GHANA EXIM BANK as its 10% share of its share of the 0.75% Import Levy” and that GEPA was not provided with any evidence such as transactions report or funds release advice from the GHANA EXIM BANK or the Controller General of the Ghana Revenue Authority”; so how could monies transferred from the account of Ghana Exim Bank and duly receipted by Ghana Export Promotion Authority be classified as missing monies and therefore attract such a prominent front-page banner headline?” the EXIM bank quizzed further.
Read the full rejoinder by the Ghana Exim Bank on the said publication in the Herald newspaper below.
RE: GHS 33 MILLION MISSING AT GHANA EXIM BANK
The attention of the Management of GHANA EXIM BANK has been drawn to a front page publication with the above banner headline in THE HERALD which also featured the picture of our Chief Executive Officer.
Management deem the publication as malicious, mischievous and misleading and has no factual basis and it is only intended to bring the hard-won reputation of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr Lawrence Agyisam and the Bank into disrepute. And in view of the fallacious nature of the reportage, we wish to rebut the content and set the records straight and hereby state the following; That;
• No GHS 33 Million is or has been missing from the accounts of the GHANA EXIM BANK between the stated period of the said audit carried out at the Ghana Export Promotion Authority by the Auditor General Dept;
•In your said report, you stated amongst others that, “ GEPA received a total of GHS32,949,957.57 from GHANA EXIM BANK as its 10% share of its share of the 0.75% Import Levy” and that GEPA was not provided with any evidence such as transactions report or funds release advice from the GHANA EXIM BANK or the Controller General of the Ghana Revenue Authority”; so how could monies transferred from the account of Ghana Exim Bank and duly receipted by Ghana Export Promotion Authority be classified as missing monies and therefore attract such a prominent front-page banner headline?
• In view of the obvious interest that your paper seemed to have shown in the Audit Report, and your subsequent wide publication of it, management would have expected that such a responsible media house could have cross-checked with the Bank to verify the veracity or otherwise of the Report before going to the Press but unfortunately, this basic ethic of the journalistic profession was not adhered to.
• The Bank has documentary evidence of the said transaction and is ready to submit same for authentication and verification by any State Regulatory Institution mandated to do so.
• As a statutory public institution, we strictly operate and are guided by the tenets of the Public Financial Management Act 20016,(Act 921) and the Bank’s Finance and Accounting Manual which enjoins us to prudently protect and use of public funds;
• We want reiterate that the Bank operates an open-door policy with its cherished stakeholders, including the media, and would want to use this medium to urge the general public especially the media, to always endeavour to seek clarification(s) on any issue (s) concerning the operation of the Bank.
• For the information of the general public, per the Ghana Export –Import Bank Act 2016, Act (911), the Ministry of Finance is the supervisory Ministry of the Bank and not the Ministry of Trade and Industry as wrongly stated in the report.
• Being a responsible public institution and in view of the malicious and distorted reportage on the subject matter by your paper, we demand that you publish this rejoinder and give it the same prominence as the main story.
• We hope our right to rejoinder will be respected.
Latest Stories
-
A plane crashed into a tower in Beijing but China is not saying what happened
1 hour -
Beyond Gold: Why Ghana must build strategic national reserves for the next global crisis
1 hour -
South Africa’s anti-migrant protesters march nationwide, after thousands flee violence
3 hours -
Ebola outbreak could cost Africa up to $3.6 billion, UN says
3 hours -
Bayer’s $7.25 billion Roundup settlement gets August hearing date
3 hours -
TikTok to settle with teen plaintiff before California social media trial, law firm says
3 hours -
Mbappe scores twice as France breeze past Sweden into last 16
4 hours -
Chinese tycoon sentenced to 30 years in US jail
4 hours -
Apple says it is releasing updates early in response to AI cybersecurity concerns
4 hours -
Boeing says IT outage affected computer systems, applications
4 hours -
AC Milan sign PSG’s Portugal striker Ramos for £60m
4 hours -
Villa among four Premier League clubs fined by Uefa
4 hours -
Rosenior nears management return at Paris FC
4 hours -
Basketball superstar LeBron James to leave LA Lakers
5 hours -
Flooding in Accra – It’s all about leadership (or lack of it)!
5 hours