Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Private legal practitioner Martin Kpebu has described the Supreme Court's ruling affirming the Attorney-General's authority to discontinue prosecutions initiated by the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) as a significant constitutional safeguard that will keep the anti-corruption agency in check.

Reacting to the judgment in an interview on Citi FM on Wednesday, July 29, Mr Kpebu said the decision provides much-needed clarity on the constitutional relationship between the Attorney-General and the OSP.

"It's a welcome relief, very timely. It will help to at least keep Kissi Agyebeng in check for a bit," he said.

According to Mr Kpebu, the ruling confirms that although the OSP has prosecutorial powers under the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, those powers are exercised on behalf of the Attorney-General.

He explained that the Constitution vests the power to prosecute criminal cases in the Attorney-General, who also retains the authority to discontinue any prosecution at any stage.

"The Supreme Court has been very clear that the Office of the Special Prosecutor is under the Attorney-General's office. The decision is that it's only the Attorney-General who has power to prosecute. Any other person prosecuting a criminal case is doing it on behalf of the Attorney-General," he stated.

Mr Kpebu argued that the judgment creates an important constitutional check against any potential abuse of prosecutorial authority by the OSP.

He said individuals who believe they have been unfairly targeted by the anti-graft agency can now seek redress from the Attorney-General, who has the power to review the case and discontinue proceedings where appropriate.

"The Attorney-General will call for the file and look at it and see if your case has merit. The Attorney-General will stop what the OSP is doing. So that's very key. It's a key check," he added.

The Supreme Court's ruling followed a constitutional challenge filed by private legal practitioner Noah Adamtey, who argued that Parliament could not confer independent prosecutorial powers on the OSP because Article 88 of the 1992 Constitution vests that authority in the Attorney-General.

While the apex court upheld the constitutionality of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (Act 959), it ruled that the Attorney-General's constitutional power to discontinue prosecutions remains intact, including in cases initiated by the Special Prosecutor.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.