Audio By Carbonatix
The Supreme Court will decide if ex-President Donald Trump is immune from being prosecuted on charges of trying to overturn the 2020 election.
The 6-3 conservative majority court decided on Wednesday to hear Mr Trump's claims that he should be shielded from criminal liability.
The ruling marks the first time the court has weighed in on such a case.
A US Court of Appeals panel has already rejected Mr Trump's argument that he enjoys presidential immunity.
Mr Trump had claimed in the landmark legal case that he was immune from all criminal charges for acts he said fell within his duties as president.
But the appeals court ruled unanimously against the 77-year-old, writing that: "We cannot accept former President Trump's claim that a president has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralise the most fundamental check on executive power - the recognition and implementation of election results."
He appealed the case to the Supreme Court and asked to put that decision on hold.
On his Truth Social site, Mr Trump welcomed Wednesday's decision and contended that without immunity "Presidents will always be concerned, and even paralyzed, by the prospect of wrongful prosecution and retaliation after they leave office".
"This could actually lead to the extortion and blackmail of a President," he wrote.
Mr Trump was charged last year with witness tampering and conspiracy to defraud the US in federal court in Washington DC over his attempts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden.
Jack Smith, who was appointed as special counsel in the investigation, brought the charges against Mr Trump, and pushed for the trial to be held this year.
The court could have let the appellate court judgement stand, which would have allowed the trial proceedings to resume.
Instead, a minimum of four of the nine justices voted to take up the case. That suggests that there is some debate within the court on whether Mr Trump has some immunity from prosecution.
The decision has the potential to seriously delay the trial, which was originally scheduled for March.
Arguments in the Supreme Court case are scheduled for the week of 22 April, and any trial will have to wait until after a decision is made.
Although a decision could come swiftly, the justices could rule that the former president is immune from prosecution, or issue a decision that further delays legal action.
Justice Department guidelines limit prosecutorial action in politically sensitive investigations from within 60 days of an election - meaning prosecutors face a deadline of early September.
And if Mr Trump wins in November, there is a growing possibility that the case never reaches trial. His Justice Department officials could drop or indefinitely suspend the special counsel investigation or he could take the unprecedented step of issuing a pardon for himself.
The Republican front-runner candidate for president is facing a host of other federal and state criminal charges.
The former president is facing a trial starting in late March on charges of falsifying business records over hush-money payment he made to a porn star.
The Supreme Court is also hearing arguments in a separate case weighing whether Mr Trump can be disqualified from running for a second term under the 14th Amendment's "insurrection ban."
Mr Trump has pleaded not guilty in all the cases, frequently referring to them as political "witch hunts".
Latest Stories
-
MoMo Fintech Lab attracts close to 1K entries from innovators across, applications end on Sept 30
19 minutes -
Black Stars face Ivorian test as injuries force major squad changes
33 minutes -
Save Nations Foundation donates learning materials to Nooria Islamic Basic School, calls for more support
40 minutes -
From selling food to solving problems: How Esther Owusu Nkwantabisah rethought entrepreneurship
54 minutes -
Explained: Ghana’s water plant deal that produced a $235m judgment debt instead of water for 500,000 people
1 hour -
High Cost of Domestic Airline Fares: Can government do something about it?
1 hour -
Inflation, cedi depreciation put BoG’s MPC under pressure as policy rate decision looms
1 hour -
Lawyer denies Salomey Baffoe received money from ‘Ghana Jollof’ account operator
2 hours -
Beyond politics: Why Kwame Nkrumah’s ideals still matter for today’s leaders
2 hours -
Top South African policeman charged with sexual offences
2 hours -
More than 170,000 respiratory cases recorded in haze-choked Indonesia
2 hours -
Narrowed space, intolerance – Sammy Crabbe says NPP is driving talented members away
2 hours -
We’re not analytical enough – Sammy Crabbe calls for data-driven decision-making
2 hours -
Tonto Dikeh celebrates Bobrisky as birthday tribute sparks online reactions
3 hours -
Peter Okoye tells court he received over $800,000 in P-Square royalties
3 hours