Former Chief Executive of the National Petroleum Authority (NPA), Alex Mould, has kicked against the introduction of a GHp13.5 Cylinder Recovery Margin by the NPA in the last petroleum pricing window.
According to him, even though the timing was wrong, he does not believe the decision was properly thought through before its implementation to over burden the consumer during such difficult and tumultuous times.
“Why should consumers outside the new system’s pilot regions pay now?
This distribution system is being given a trial run in the following pilot sites: Kade in the Eastern region and Obuasi in the Ashanti region, which currently account for less than 2% of total LPG usage.
“However, as the Cylinder Recovery Margin has been introduced nation-wide, this connotes 98% of consumers are paying for the benefit of the 2% i.e. those within the two pilot regions,” the Finance and Energy expert queried.
Read Full Statement
WHY MUST 98% of LPG CONSUMERS PAY NEW MARGIN TO BENEFIT ONLY 2% – ALEX MOULD TO GOVERNMENT
We understand the National Petroleum Authority (NPA) introduced a GHp 13.5 Cylinder Recovery Margin during the last Petroleum Pricing window.
This is bad timing by the Authority; considering the current health crisis the last thing the consumer needs is to be burdened with this margin during such difficult and tumultuous times.
As such, the NPA owes the general public a thorough and detailed explanation. We understand they’ve engaged stakeholders in 10 out of the 16 regions but I still can’t fathom why the rush to introduce the new margin when there’s not enough literature out there to educate and prepare the minds of LPG consumers.
For starters, why the decision to immediately burden all consumers (even those outside of CRM pilot and operational regions), with the margin? Why should consumers outside the new system’s pilot regions pay now?
This distribution system is being given a trial run in the following pilot sites: Kade in the Eastern region and Obuasi in the Ashanti region, which currently account for less than 2% of total LPG usage.
However, as the Cylinder Recovery Margin has been introduced nation-wide, this connotes 98% of consumers are paying for the benefit of the 2% i.e. those within the two pilot regions.
Silently slipping the Cylinder Recovery Margin into the pricing model with no prior communication is not only unfair but comes across as deceitful.
Especially at a time when prices have fallen and the benefit should accrue to consumers!!!
Some other questions that the NPA needs to answer include the following:
These are mind boggling questions that I’ve researched myself but surprisingly found little or no answers on the internet nor the NPA’s website.
The LPG Marketers have called for a withdrawal of this new LPG margin. Yet, the NPA continuously insists that the new LPG margin did not result in LPG price hikes.
It’s a disingenuous and inconsiderate Regulator who disregards the plight of consumers!!!
END
Signed
Alex Mould
04/04/2020