Audio By Carbonatix
A law lecturer at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Mr Kofi Abotsi, has disagreed with proposals to introduce pay disparities between Members of Parliament (MPs) depending on the length of time they have served.
The pay differences, according to him, cannot be justified by the mere fact of how long one has served in Parliament.
He however agreed that the salaries of MPs should be reviewed upwards.
On Wednesday, 19 January, 2011, a former Deputy Majority Leader, John Tia told Joy News that a Parliamentary Committee is deliberating on the issue of whether MPs who have served longer should receive more salary new members.
He said members of the committee were of the view that MPs who have longer period should receive more salary.
A labour consultant, Austin Gamey, agreed.
According to him, the same can be seen in other public organizations where one’s salary is determined by how long he or she has worked at the organization.
He however played down comparisons between MPs who do not have higher academic certificates and those who have, insisting comparisons are unfair since MPs are not determined based on educational standards but determined by the electorate.
But speaking on Joy FM’s Super Morning Show, Mr Abotsi averred that it would be ambiguous to determine who qualifies to be a senior MP since Parliament begins a new session after every general election.
“…I find it very difficult also to rationalize and justify that [MPs’ pay disparities]. If we are paying officials within Parliament, i.e. the Leadership of Parliament holding specific offices and being assigned specific responsibilities a certain amount of money, I think that is easy to rationalize.
"But paying people simply on the basis of seniority and on the basis of the fact that they’ve been in the House longer than others, I think that is problematic,” he stated.
Mr Tia who is also the Information Minister said the committee intend to propose to the President’s Committee on Emoluments that the salary of MPs be pegged GH¢8,000 a month.
That, he said was to help MPs meet their insurmountable financial burden often placed on them by their constituents.
Story by Fidel Amoah/Myjoyonline.com
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Minority rejects finance minister’s claims of blocked GH¢350m flood relief fund
28 seconds -
Police warn against violence ahead of Tema Homowo Festival
2 minutes -
Vice President calls for stronger city partnerships to tackle global challenges
17 minutes -
ASEC welcomes 2026 Mid-Year Budget but urges stronger focus on green transition
19 minutes -
We split bills equally even when one of us earned a lot more
21 minutes -
Concerned National Service Association demands refund of GH¢4.2m deducted from personnel allowances
26 minutes -
Teshie Homowo 2026 to usher in new era of peace, security, national recognition – Chief
26 minutes -
Baba Jamal Konneh retracts galamsey claims, apologises to Oppong Nkrumah after GH¢30m defamation suit
34 minutes -
Ghana Sports Fund wants to produce athletes who build national wealth
37 minutes -
Ashanti NPP mobilises supporters for solidarity visit to Wontumi at Nsawam Prison
38 minutes -
Ghana Sports Fund targets sustainable financing to transform sports into a wealth-creating industry
42 minutes -
Ghana Sports Fund sets sights on making Ghana Africa’s next destination for major sporting events
44 minutes -
Parliament defers debate on the 2026 mid-year budget review to Tuesday
45 minutes -
In Pictures: Scenes from Parliament during 2026 Mid-Year Budget Review
49 minutes -
Two Tales, One Country: Review of the Mid-Year Budget
50 minutes