Previous truces have collapsed and without a formal announcement or presentation of a written agreement, many remained wary. The hints of progress on Thursday still sent the main US stock indexes up about 1%. The US reportedly offered to halve tariff rates on about $350bn worth of Chinese goods, some of which had climbed as high as 25%. However, the deal is not expected to address many of the more difficult issues that triggered the fight, like China's subsidies for certain industries. As described, the potential agreement falls short of what the US initially said were its goals, said Jennifer Hillman, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former trade official. "This should NOT be described as a trade agreement," she wrote on Twitter. "It is a purchase and sale agreement that does virtually nothing to address substantive concerns of US (+rest of the world) with China's trade practices."Getting VERY close to a BIG DEAL with China. They want it, and so do we!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2019
Mr Trump has repeatedly declared progress toward a deal that would end the trade war, which has seen tariffs imposed on more than $450bn worth of US-China trade and weighed on the global economy. In October, he announced that the two sides had agreed to terms for a "Phase One" deal, but negotiations dragged on. Without progress, the US had threatened to impose tariffs on more than $150bn worth of Chinese exports on 15 December. Unlike earlier rounds of tariffs, this one was slated to fall largely on everyday items, including smartphones, children's books, footwear and clothing, heightening the economic stakes, since the US economy is driven by consumer spending. Goldman Sachs analysts estimated that US economic growth could be 0.4% lower next year, without some sort of deal to avoid the next tariffs and roll back some of those already in place. White House officials have downplayed the risks, arguing the tariffs are aimed at making China give up "unfair" trade practices, such as alleged intellectual property theft.As former USTR Mike Froman put it, this should NOT be described as a trade agreement. It is a purchase and sale agreement that does virtually nothing to address substantive concerns of US (+rest of the world) with China's trade practices. +US farmers + consumers paid heavy price. https://t.co/uqwbAKefeQ
— Jennifer Hillman (@J_A_Hillman) December 12, 2019
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
PPA Clarification: The dark side of the World Bank’s ‘giveaways’ in Ghana by Bright Simons
48 mins -
Blinken says China helping fuel Russian threat to Ukraine
2 hours -
MHA declares May as Purple Month for Mental Health Awareness
2 hours -
WAEC arrests former headmaster over illegal students registration
2 hours -
MeToo founder Tarana Burke defiant after Harvey Weinstein ruling
2 hours -
Be alert, insist on decent messages – Dwumfour tells media
3 hours -
Father jailed 10 years for burning daughter’s genitals with hot cutlasses
3 hours -
I aim to help Ghana produce world-class athletes – Asamoah Gyan
3 hours -
Ashanti Regional Minister alleges sabotage in electricity supply
3 hours -
2024 Elections: Dampare urges Ghanaians to prioritise patriotism and display maturity
3 hours -
‘Let it rot’ campaign hits fish prices in Egypt
3 hours -
Otumfuo chalks 25 years on Golden Stool today
3 hours -
Saudi could get first Miss Universe contestant this year
3 hours -
Ghana Shippers’ Authority initiates steps to sign Service Level Agreements with stakeholders
3 hours -
Fuse ODG supports rising artiste, Fred Kobby, with funds for music video
3 hours