Audio By Carbonatix
A member of President Akufo-Addo’s legal team, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah has said the submissions by lead counsel for the petitioner in court are based on opinions rather than the law.
According to Kojo Oppong Nkrumah, although Tsatsu Tsikata provided a lengthy submission to prove a case worthy of review, it failed to win victory for the petitioner.
“You heard Tsatsu Tsikata on his feet for about an hour trying to establish the necessity for which they should be granted leave to inspect these documents.
"Yes, as a matter of fact, you'll notice that counsel for the petitioner sometimes has about an hour. Today, you'll notice that from about 9:30 am to 10:30 am there about, he was on his feet making arguments.
“It is not the one-hour submission and English that will invoke the court to exercise its discretion in this matter. You must ground it in law and prove same,” he said.
Again, he stated that the application was dismissed because “this is a court of law and not a court of public opinion.”
He further stated that Tsatsu Tsikata failed to satisfy the legal requirements expected of him, that is to prove a case of lack of authenticity by the Electoral Commission.
"When you make an application before the court, you must satisfy what the law requires and back it with authorities that are relevant or the legal invocations that are relevant," he stated.
Touching on the proceedings in court, Mr. Oppong Nkrumah stated that the legal counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents are, however, crisp in their response and submissions.
He noted that the 1st and 2nd legal counsels are limiting themselves to the law and the legal requirement by not necessarily arguing with the bench.
"So what does the law say? That is what we are interested in."
"We don't need a lot of grammar to make our case and that is why you notice that we are not spending too much time speaking English but we are speaking law," he added.
Meanwhile, the spokesperson for the petitioner’s legal team, Marietta Brew Appiah-Oppong is resolute that John Mahama has a strong case in court.
"Irrespective of the fact that our applications have been refused; we came to the court prepared and we are ready to continue with the case. And we will go through with the case till the very end," she stated.
The Supreme Court has adjourned sitting to Friday, February 5, 2021.
Latest Stories
-
Joy FM Back-to-School Fair gains momentum as Day 2 gets underway
10 minutes -
Bright Simons fires back, rejects claims he used AI to critique SIGA report
20 minutes -
SIGA did not conjure or manufacture figures – Prof Kpessa-Whyte
40 minutes -
Government just put a spin on SIGA report – Miracles Aboagye
51 minutes -
Big Chef Season 5: Two contestants face exit in Jollof Challenge
1 hour -
SIGA’s ‘massive turnaround’ claim not borne out by data – Bright Simons
1 hour -
Nhyiaeso Chief assures support to end encroachment on utility corridors in Kumasi
1 hour -
Two lorry station masters arrested over alleged plot to kill creditor over ₵91k debt
2 hours -
SIGA’s claim on highest audited proportion inaccurate – Bright Simons
2 hours -
Money bouquets, spraying and dancing on cash unlawful – BoG warns
2 hours -
Sam George pushes for nationwide 4G upgrade of rural telephony sites
2 hours -
Local Government Ministry to support MMDAs to deliver gov’t agenda
2 hours -
At least five killed in Sudan’s South Kordofan in attack by rebel group
3 hours -
“Music is so stressful” – Headless YouTuber on why he won’t return
3 hours -
Cleveland police chief proud of force but being ‘let down’ by funding
3 hours