Audio By Carbonatix
The New Patriotic Party (NPP) Member of Parliament for Suame, John Darko, has strongly criticised the establishment of the Operation Recover All Loot (ORAL) team by President John Mahama, describing it as illegal and unconstitutional.
According to him, President Mahama lacked the legal authority to form the committee at the time, as he was merely the president-elect and not yet in office.
Speaking on JoyFM Top Story on Wednesday, January 15, Mr Darko argued that Section 3 of the Whistleblowers Act lists specific individuals and entities to whom whistleblowers can report, such as Police Officers, the Attorney General, the Auditor General, Staff of Intelligence Agencies, and Members of Parliament.
He stated that while his colleague in Parliament, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, who is the MP for North Tongu qualifies to be on the committee, he questioned the qualifications of other members of the ORAL team under the provisions of the Act.
“If we take Hon Okudzeto Ablakwa who is a Member of Parliament and so if anybody feels that some crime has been committed, it can go to him.
"But does Martin Kpebu fall into any of these categories? Is he a member of the National Media Commission? Is Kofi Boakye, the former Police officer, a member of the Narcotics Control Board? Is Mr. Domelevo part of a district assembly or head of a recognized institution or religious body," he asked.
Mr Darko insisted that the formation of the ORAL team contravened the provisions of the Whistleblowers Act.
He further noted that as president-elect, Mr Mahama did not have executive authority at the time to create such a committee.
“The Whistleblowers Act he's talking about has the people you can disclose information to not a group of people set up by a President.
“In any case, when His Excellency the President John Dramani Mahama set up the ORAL Committee, he was the president-elect, he did not hold any executive authority. What legal authority did he have to set up the ORAL in the first place," the Suame MP questioned.
He asserted that the ORAL Committee, from its inception, lacked a constitutional foundation, stating that the committee is "unconstitutional and illegal."
Latest Stories
-
AFCON 2027: Ghana has no business doing football if we can’t beat Somalia and The Gambia to qualify – George Afriyie
3 minutes -
Starlets to face Togo on October 10 in U-17 AFCON qualifying campaign
14 minutes -
FIFA U-20 World Cup: Princesses showed character-Head Coach
19 minutes -
PBee releases new single ‘Lose My Mind’ featuring SIICIE today
46 minutes -
Many have been dismissed – Interior Minister exposes forged WASSCE results in security recruitment
50 minutes -
NCA clears MTN, Telecel, Goal for next stage of 5G spectrum licensing
58 minutes -
Father demands probe into death of Central University student in motorway crash
1 hour -
Transport Minister orders urgent action to tackle surge in port congestion
1 hour -
NPP national executive election: Here are the ballot positions
1 hour -
Court orders police to file disclosures in Labone robbery case
1 hour -
Central Regional Minister lauds Gomoa Central Assembly for effective utilisation of Common Fund
1 hour -
What must gov’ts do to make food systems drive job creation in Africa? – Fareeda Mustapha asks Rwanda’s Kagame
2 hours -
Gender Minister calls for equitable gender roles to support girls’ development
2 hours -
Prioritise rural businesses in Women’s Bank – NETRIGHT urges gov’t
2 hours -
Guinea backs Morocco’s Sahara autonomy plan as ‘sole solution’ to dispute
2 hours