Audio By Carbonatix
The New Patriotic Party (NPP) Member of Parliament for Suame, John Darko, has strongly criticised the establishment of the Operation Recover All Loot (ORAL) team by President John Mahama, describing it as illegal and unconstitutional.
According to him, President Mahama lacked the legal authority to form the committee at the time, as he was merely the president-elect and not yet in office.
Speaking on JoyFM Top Story on Wednesday, January 15, Mr Darko argued that Section 3 of the Whistleblowers Act lists specific individuals and entities to whom whistleblowers can report, such as Police Officers, the Attorney General, the Auditor General, Staff of Intelligence Agencies, and Members of Parliament.
He stated that while his colleague in Parliament, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, who is the MP for North Tongu qualifies to be on the committee, he questioned the qualifications of other members of the ORAL team under the provisions of the Act.
“If we take Hon Okudzeto Ablakwa who is a Member of Parliament and so if anybody feels that some crime has been committed, it can go to him.
"But does Martin Kpebu fall into any of these categories? Is he a member of the National Media Commission? Is Kofi Boakye, the former Police officer, a member of the Narcotics Control Board? Is Mr. Domelevo part of a district assembly or head of a recognized institution or religious body," he asked.
Mr Darko insisted that the formation of the ORAL team contravened the provisions of the Whistleblowers Act.
He further noted that as president-elect, Mr Mahama did not have executive authority at the time to create such a committee.
“The Whistleblowers Act he's talking about has the people you can disclose information to not a group of people set up by a President.
“In any case, when His Excellency the President John Dramani Mahama set up the ORAL Committee, he was the president-elect, he did not hold any executive authority. What legal authority did he have to set up the ORAL in the first place," the Suame MP questioned.
He asserted that the ORAL Committee, from its inception, lacked a constitutional foundation, stating that the committee is "unconstitutional and illegal."
Latest Stories
-
“God Bless You”: The Currency of Gratitude Among Ghana’s Poor
1 hour -
Heal Komfo Anokye Project to respond to governance and accountability claims
1 hour -
Calls grow for NHIS to cover prescription glasses after over 500 miss free eye care in Bono Region
3 hours -
Nkwanta South: Death toll from Odomi attack now 4 as curfew takes effect
3 hours -
Impakers Creative Hub earns Trade Minister’s praise at Ghana–Italy Circular Economy Dialogue
3 hours -
Coderina EdTech donates STEM materials to support ICT, coding education in Ghana
3 hours -
Iran recloses Strait of Hormuz, citing Israeli strikes on Lebanon
3 hours -
Hackman Owusu-Agyeman backs St Augustine’s teachers’ housing project by APSU 2002 to mark 97th anniversry
3 hours -
GIPC CEO courts Canadian investors in Toronto
3 hours -
Harry and Meghan offered royal accommodation during UK visit
3 hours -
Ntim Fordjour demands answers over Australia drug seizure linked to Ghana
3 hours -
West Hills Mall to celebrate fatherhood with ‘Dad’s Day Out’ campaign
3 hours -
FIFA Ranking: Black Stars move eight places up after World Cup win over PanamaÂ
3 hours -
Google unveils biggest-ever Street View expansion in Ghana with sharper imagery and wider coverage
4 hours -
There is ‘zero chance’ Mahama will appoint a politically neutral EC deputy chairperson — Kofi Bentil
4 hours