Constitutional Lawyer, Martin Kpebu, has lauded the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case involving Mr. Daniel Domelevo.
This concerns the directive from the Presidency asking former Auditor-General Daniel Domelevo to proceed on leave.
According to him, the court’s unanimous decision describing the directive as unconstitutional is landmark and would go a long way to protect independent constitutional bodies in the country.
Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile, he mentioned that the ruling is a step in the right direction to ensure that the president’s extensive powers are curtailed.
“You know there are seven independent constitutional bodies in the constitution.
“So with this decision on the Auditor General, it’s going to affect all the other six. So we’re looking at apart from the Auditor-General, we have the judicial service, we have the Lands Commission, almighty EC, National Media Commission, BoG that was spineless and last year financed the government with about 40 billion dollars which helped to spike inflation, so this decision will help BoG too in its independence, and you can check the IMF report where the IMF berated the BoG for its weakness – it couldn’t hold its own against the government. So this is a decision that will help.
“So it means that we are helping to cut back on the autocratic tendencies of our president because that has always been the bane of our democracy that we’ve given too much power to an executive president under Article 58 and 57 and that’s largely to blame for a lot of our problems,” he said.
The Supreme Court in a unanimous decision described as unconstitutional the directive from the presidency that asked former Auditor-General Daniel Domelevo to proceed on leave.
The court also described as unconstitutional the president’s appointment of an Acting Auditor General while there was a substantive Auditor-General.
The presidency in July 2020 asked the then Auditor General to proceed on leave.
When Mr Domelevo pointed this out as unlawful, his leave was further extended from 123 days to 167 effective July 1, 2020.
Nine civil society groups sued the Attorney General over these directives.
They included the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Ghana Integrity Initiative, (GII), Citizen Movement Ghana, Africa Center for Energy Policy (ACEP), and Parliamentary Network Africa.
They contended that the directives were unlawful since the president does not have the power to exercise such disciplinary control over independent bodies.
The Court, however, opted not to issue any other orders including stopping Mr Domelevo from proceeding on leave since he has since retired.
The case was heard by Justices Nene Amegatcher, Prof Ashie Kotey, Mariama Owusu, Lovelace Johnson, Getrude Torkonoo, Prof Henrietta Mensah Bonsu and Emmanuel Kulendi.
- Why Kenya’s Eliud Kipchoge chose the Berlin Marathon to prepare for the Paris Olympics
- Vodafone Director calls on SMEs to seize opportunities at upcoming Business Runway event
- FIFA and United Nations Industrial Development Organization meet to discuss collaboration opportunities
- Fuse ODG gets romantic in new single; releases ‘3eak a.m (Waistline)’
- Kotoko is building, so fans should be patient and support – Emmanuel Agyemang-Badu
- ‘Cannabis muffins’ given to 90 schoolchildren in South Africa
- Limited Voter Registration: EC assures all eligible voters will be registered
- Ghana’s economy not yet on a recovery path – Prof. Mensah insists
- Over 5,000 people benefit from free health screening by Lifetime Wells Vision
- We needed someone to get us goals, and Mohammed Kudus did – West Ham boss David Moyes
- Stop lecturing us, Guinea junta leader tells West
- PAC’s order to MMDAs to stop engaging our services is unfortunate and surprising – Zoomlion
- Over 350 farmers receive 53,000 tree crop seedlings in Sekyere Kumawu District
- ‘Things have deteriorated’ – E.L spotted at #OccupyJulorBiHouse protest Day 2
- Akufo-Addo was not sincere with Ghanaians in his self-assessment of fighting corruption – Domelevo