'Elaborate handwriting'
In what BBC royal correspondent Jonny Dymond described as a "very robust" response from the Mail on Sunday, the paper argued in a court document that members of the Royal Family, including Meghan, "rely on publicity about themselves and their lives in order to maintain the privileged positions they hold and promote themselves". It said the duchess "did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy that the contents of the letter were private and would remain so". "There is a huge and legitimate public interest in the Royal Family and the activities, conduct and standards of behaviour of its members," it said. "This extends not merely to their public conduct, but to their personal and family relationships because those are integral to the proper functioning of the monarchy." The 44-page legal filing by the Mail on Sunday aims to tackle the duchess' claims one by one:- Meghan claimed she had not courted publicity for her relationship with her father, but the paper says she has not denied authorising her friends to speak about it for an article in a US magazine
- The duchess said publishing the letter breached her copyright, but the Mail on Sunday says it was not a protected "original literary work" but a recounting of existing facts
- Meghan said it infringed her data rights, but the newspaper says the data was not sensitive and concerned topics she had put in the public domain
- Accused of selective editing, the Mail on Sunday says the extracts it released accurately conveyed the tone, content and meaning of the letter
'Relentless propaganda'
In October, law firm Schillings, acting for the duchess, filed a High Court claim against the Mail on Sunday and its parent company Associated Newspapers over the alleged misuse of private information, infringement of copyright and breach of the Data Protection Act 2018. At the time, Harry said he and his wife were forced to take action against "relentless propaganda". Referring to his late mother Diana, Princess of Wales, he said: "I lost my mother and now I watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces." The legal proceedings are being funded privately by the couple and any proceeds will be donated to an anti-bullying charity. It is not the first time the royals have taken legal action against the press. In 2017, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were awarded £92,000 (100,000 euros) in damages after French magazine Closer printed topless pictures of the duchess in 2012.DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
Latest Stories
-
Funny Face failed to perform at my show after taking money – Parrot Mouth
2 mins -
CAFCC: Sports Minister to offer Dreams FC a ‘surprise’ package before Zamalek clash
14 mins -
CAF awards 3-0 win to RS Berkane, after Algerian customs confiscated their kits
29 mins -
AgriTech challenge pro holds first pitch
33 mins -
UNIDO commits to improving local rice standards
34 mins -
Suleja prison: 108 inmates on the run in Nigeria
37 mins -
We object to government’s plans to make BEST sole off-taker of Sentuo Oil Refinery – CBOD
45 mins -
Burkina Faso army massacred 223 villagers in revenge attack – HRW
54 mins -
Lebanese Community awards ¢100K in scholarships to 21 students at UniMAC
56 mins -
Germany detains alleged Nigerian mafia members
59 mins -
Manhyia Palace hosts royals, dignitaries from Ghana and beyond at special Awukudee
1 hour -
Meet the two Ghanaian entrepreneurs on a mission to connect 1 million African professionals to global companies by 2034
1 hour -
Celestine Donkor speaks on report of undergoing weight loss surgery
1 hour -
Music sensation Osb Swagah drops new single ‘Victory’
1 hour -
Bright Simons: The SML defence “falls flat”
2 hours