Audio By Carbonatix
The Premier League is to request a court order forcing internet service providers to block a popular football streaming website before the next season.
The League wants ISPs to cut off access to FirstRow1.eu, which operates from Sweden.
The BBC understands none of the ISPs plan to challenge the court order.
If successful, the action will be the first sport-related site block in the UK.
The Premier League's move follows a precedent set by the BPI music industry body, which has been successful in having several piracy websites blocked in the UK, most notably the Pirate Bay.
In those cases, ISPs have stood firm and insisted they would only take action if ordered to do so by the courts.
The UK's major ISPs each received a letter from the Premier League outlining a possible court order, and were given a deadline of Friday to signal any intent to challenge the action.
When approached by the BBC, none of the ISPs would comment specifically on the Premier League's planned action, but all reiterated that blocking of sites would not be done voluntarily.
'Conflicts of interest'
The situation raises additional issues for BT, as from next season it will be a major distributor of Premier League football through its new sports TV channels.
BT has paid £246m for rights to show Premier League football, while Sky paid £760m for its portion of the coverage.
Sky's ISP operation has historically been seen as taking a more sympathetic stance with copyright holders requesting the blocking of sites, whereas BT has in the past taken such battles to court on behalf of the ISP industry as a whole.
Jim Killock, of the Open Rights Group, said he worried that conflicted interests might lead to the blocking process becoming less transparent.
"All of the major ISPs now have differing degrees of conflicts of interest," he told the BBC.
"Sky, BT, Virgin and TalkTalk all supply televisions services now, so we have to expect that there will be more reluctance to be as transparent as they have been in the past."
Mr Killock also expressed concern that as the process for granting court orders gets quicker, it may lead to sites being wrongly blocked out.
"It's possible that very legitimate services will at some point be attacked by one of these orders.
"Our main concern here is that these orders should be considered slowly, and they should be subject to much more public review."
FirstRow1.eu did not respond to the BBC's request for comment.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Banks’ sustainable success will be defined less by interest margins – PwC
28 minutes -
Baffoe-Bonnie was part of ‘grand conspiracy’ against Torkornoo – Afenyo-Markin
32 minutes -
The GIPA Act: Resetting Ghana’s investment framework
1 hour -
GIPA secures investor leads at Invest Fest 2026
2 hours -
Ghana’s missing billions: What 16 years of Auditor-General reports show
2 hours -
Police disown viral flyer on AirPods, earphones use while driving
2 hours -
Stop using media to challenge judicial decisions – Thaddeus Sory to lawyers
2 hours -
The next generation expects more than degrees from universities
2 hours -
Ebenezer Dwomoh to stage fourth stand-up comedy special in Kumasi
2 hours -
Central Regional Minister urges traditional leaders to hold public officials accountable
2 hours -
Ada Traditional Council suspends four members for defying cancellation of 2026 Asafotufiami durbar
2 hours -
Association of Small-scale Industries, GEA strengthen artisans through mentorship, coaching
2 hours -
Two arrested over alleged galamsey activities in Tanoso
2 hours -
Ghana rises to sixth-largest gold producer globally after record 2025 output
2 hours -
Five injured in road crash at Ahwerase
2 hours