Audio By Carbonatix
President Donald Trump will no longer pursue adding a question on citizenship to the 2020 US census questionnaire.
Instead, he said he had directed officials to obtain the information through an executive order for government agencies, as court challenges would have delayed a census.
"We will leave no stone unturned," Mr Trump said.
The retreat follows a long fight over the inclusion of the question, which the Supreme Court had blocked in June.
"We are not backing down on our effort to determine the citizenship status of the United States population," the US president said.
The order will require government agencies to hand over documents regarding citizenship.
"As a result of today's executive order we will be able to ensure the 2020 census generates an accurate count of how many citizens, non-citizens and illegal aliens are in the United States of America," Mr Trump said at the White House.
What reason did the Trump administration give?
The decision to abandon the citizenship question was a "logistical impediment, not a legal one", said Attorney General William Barr, standing alongside President Trump. He said there was "ample justification" for the administration to include the citizenship question. But referring to court injunctions, he said there was no way to "implement any new decision without jeopardizing our ability to carry out the census". Census questionnaires without the citizenship question are already being printed. Mr Barr repeatedly congratulated Mr Trump on the executive order.How did the battle unfold?
At the end of last month, the Supreme Court returned the case to the Census Bureau in a 5-4 ruling that noted the reason for including the question seemed "contrived". Government lawyers indicated they had dropped the question and officials began printing the 2020 census without it. But Mr Trump then announced that he might consider an executive order to include the question or find other ways to move forward. Legal experts noted that an executive order could not override a Supreme Court ruling. The White House argued the question would bolster voter protections, but opponents said it could deter immigrant households from taking part in the census over fears the data could be shared with law enforcement agencies. Civil rights groups called it an attack on non-white Americans. Critics have also noted that lower participation by immigrants could lead to an undercount of populations in Democratic districts, benefiting the president's Republican Party and changing how seats in Congress are allocated. The Census Bureau's research indicated the citizenship question would dramatically reduce the number of people willing to participate, particularly among those who feared it could lead to deportation. The citizenship question has not appeared on a US census for all Americans since 1950, though it has been put to some subsets of the population between 1970 and 2000. The once-a-decade population count helps the US government draw up districts for state and local elections, and determine how much federal funding each state receives - a matter of hundreds of billions of dollars.DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Experts challenge culture of silence among men on mental health
34 seconds -
How is it a crime if US$279m is allocated to Gold Board? – Sammy Gyamfi questions Abena Osei-Asare
8 minutes -
UniMAC Debate champions meet Vice-Chancellor ahead of commonwealth debate competition in sydney
13 minutes -
UK retail sales get surprise boost from hot weather and World Cup
14 minutes -
Star US Supreme Court lawyer Goldstein to be sentenced for tax crimes
14 minutes -
Inconvenient Truth: When the Elephants Forget the Grass
20 minutes -
No rift with Agriculture Ministry over funds release — Ato Forson
23 minutes -
Culture before internal communication plan: Why Africa needs the ACCRA framework
25 minutes -
Samsung introduces 2 new products into Ghanaian market
39 minutes -
Spend to complete abandoned projects – Abena Osei-Asare tells government
51 minutes -
Daily Insight for CEOs: Expanding influence through partnerships
56 minutes -
US says it will use frozen Iranian assets to fund damage to ships as strikes continue
60 minutes -
Don’t just spend, invest in areas that transform lives — Abena Osei Asare tells government
1 hour -
Police reject GH¢150,000 bribe after 5,000 parcels of suspected narcotics in Tema
1 hour -
Should a good leader be feared or loved? A critical look at Ghana’s recent presidential leadership styles
1 hour