Audio By Carbonatix
A woman in South Africa has told the BBC how she was sterilised without her consent after she gave birth at the age of 17, and only learned about it 11 years later when she tried to have another child.
Bongekile Msibi was among 48 women sterilised without consent at state hospitals, the Commission for Gender Equality found.
Despite being a statutory body, the commission said its inquiry was hampered by the "disappearance" of patients' files, and its investigators had received a "hostile reception" from hospital staff.
The commission said its investigators visited 15 hospitals after civil rights groups brought the cases, some dating back to 2011, to its attention.
South Africa's health department has not yet given a detailed response to the report, but said its minister, Zweli Mkhize, had requested a meeting with the commission to discuss it.
Ms Msibi recalled her ordeal to the BBC's Clare Spencer:
I woke up after giving birth, looked down and asked: "Why do I have a huge bandage on my stomach?"
I did not mind. I had just given birth to my baby daughter. She was a big baby and I had been anaesthetised and gone through a Caesarean section.
Getty Images
How women are sterilised in SA
I left hospital five days after giving birth, with a healthy baby daughter and a huge scar across my stomach.
I did not find out what had really happened for another 11 years.
Things unravelled when I was trying to conceive again.
I had been taking the contraceptive pill for that whole time since I had given birth and so it was not strange that I had not had my period.
But I got engaged and wanted to have another baby so went to the doctor.
He examined me, sat me down, gave me a glass of water and told me I had no uterus.
Bongekile Msibi
It is very cruel what they did to me.
I went to the press, then the health ministry and eventually ended up back at the hospital where I gave birth with the doctor who said he was there that day.
He did not say sorry. He told me that he had sterilised me in order to save my life.
I still do not know what he was trying to save me from. There are no records at the hospital.
I am not the only one. An inquiry has found there are 47 others. Some were told it was because they had HIV, but I do not. I just don't know why they did it.
The doctor told me that I had signed a consent form. I had not. I was a minor at the time so would not have been able to.
He then said my mother, who was with me at the birth, had signed the consent form. She said she did not.
The news changed my life.
In the end I split up with my fiancé. I had to let him go because he really wanted children and I could not give him that.
When I met the doctor I was asked what I want.
I want a baby so badly. When I saw a pregnant colleague this week I could not stand it.
My daughter wants a sibling and when we go past street kids she suggests I bring one up as my own.
I still have ovaries and so I think the hospital should pay for a surrogate.
South African law on sterilisation
- Hysterectomy:Removal of womb or part of it
- Tubal ligation:Fallopian tubes blocked or sealed
I left hospital five days after giving birth, with a healthy baby daughter and a huge scar across my stomach.
I did not find out what had really happened for another 11 years.
Things unravelled when I was trying to conceive again.
I had been taking the contraceptive pill for that whole time since I had given birth and so it was not strange that I had not had my period.
But I got engaged and wanted to have another baby so went to the doctor.
He examined me, sat me down, gave me a glass of water and told me I had no uterus.
'It is very cruel'
I was devastated and confused. It did not make sense because I was already a mother. I worked out my uterus must have been removed and the only time it could have happened was after I had given birth.
It is very cruel what they did to me.
I went to the press, then the health ministry and eventually ended up back at the hospital where I gave birth with the doctor who said he was there that day.
He did not say sorry. He told me that he had sterilised me in order to save my life.
I still do not know what he was trying to save me from. There are no records at the hospital.
I am not the only one. An inquiry has found there are 47 others. Some were told it was because they had HIV, but I do not. I just don't know why they did it.
The doctor told me that I had signed a consent form. I had not. I was a minor at the time so would not have been able to.
He then said my mother, who was with me at the birth, had signed the consent form. She said she did not.
The news changed my life.
In the end I split up with my fiancé. I had to let him go because he really wanted children and I could not give him that.
When I met the doctor I was asked what I want.
I want a baby so badly. When I saw a pregnant colleague this week I could not stand it.
My daughter wants a sibling and when we go past street kids she suggests I bring one up as my own.
I still have ovaries and so I think the hospital should pay for a surrogate.
- Adultsentitled to it through safe methods
- Proceduremust be clearly explained, including risks and consequences
- Consentcan be withdrawn at anytime
- Formsgiving go-ahead must be understood and signed
- Separaterules must be followed for those "incapable" of consenting
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
OSP’s preventive actions saved Ghana millions – Sammy Darko
3 minutes -
Galamsey cuts off cocoa farms in Mfantseman, farmers suffer heavy losses
48 minutes -
Ghanaian delegation set for January 20, 2026 trip to Latvia in Nana Agyei case – Ablakwa
2 hours -
Accra turns white as Dîner en Blanc delivers night of elegance and culture
4 hours -
War-torn Myanmar voting in widely criticised ‘sham’ election
6 hours -
Justice by guesswork is dangerous – Constitution Review Chair calls for data-driven court reforms
6 hours -
Justice delayed is justice denied, the system is failing litigants – Constitution Review Chair
6 hours -
Reform without data is a gamble – Constitution Review Chair warns against rushing Supreme Court changes
7 hours -
Rich and voiceless: How Putin has kept Russia’s billionaires on side in the war against Ukraine
7 hours -
Cruise ship hits reef on first trip since leaving passenger on island
7 hours -
UK restricts DR Congo visas over migrant return policy
8 hours -
Attack on Kyiv shows ‘Russia doesn’t want peace’, Zelensky says
8 hours -
Two dead in 50-vehicle pile up on Japan highway
8 hours -
Fearing deportation, Hondurans in the US send more cash home than ever before
8 hours -
New York blanketed in snow, sparking travel chaos
8 hours
