The fairness of national security institutions in recruitment is a pillar in ensuring stability, peace and resilience of any given state.

However, over the last few years, issues of transparency, fairness and credibility of recruitment exercises aimed at offering young citizens an opportunity to serve their country have risen. What ought to be a noble and patriotic avenue of entry into Security service is being increasingly seen as undermined, thus becoming a serious threat to national secuirty.

The fundamental aspect of this concern is the increasing belief that the process of recruiting into the security services has not been based on National interest but it has been politically driven. The process which is supposed to be non-partisan and professional means of choosing qualified and dedicated persons interested in serving Ghana.

Unfortunately, it has become a platform where political players pursue their personal interests. This damage the confidence of the people and the pillars of professionalism, neutrality, and competence that have to be the back-bone of security institutions.

With references to the ongoing recruitment, according to data published by the sector Minister, about half a million agile youth applied to the various security services, out of which approximately 400,000 were painfully disqualified.

Again, a particularly troubling issue has emerged regarding the purchase of recruitment forms. The Minister emphatically made a statement encouraging applicants to purchase multiple forms for different security agencies, on the premise that success in one may compensate for failure in another raise serious concerns.

Such guidance not only places an unnecessary financial burden on already vulnerable youth but also suggests a lack of coordination and coherence within the recruitment framework. It creates an impression of a system driven more by revenue generation than by the objective of identifying the most qualified candidates.

More so, the fact that most applicants are not satisfied with the process also contributes to a lack of trust in the process. The existence of disqualifications on dubious or vague grounds has been reported, hence causing a lot of frustration. Of utmost importance is the aptitude testing phase which is aimed at objectively determining the intellectual and analytical abilities of the applicants.

The fact that, the aptitude tests was conducted by TRYBNET, where the questions were artificially generated, which contradicts the purpose of security services. The questions were totally irrelevant, and does not fit to measure the competencies of the applicants. The validity of the results is questionable when assessment tools are viewed as poor and biased.

There are far-reaching consequences of such flawed procedures. Constant feelings of unfairness, marginalization, and deceit among the youth may one day lead to serious violent extremism. Youth that experience a sense of systematic marginalisation or exploitation can slowly lose their trust in the institutions of the state. In the long run, such a loss of trust may provide fertile soil to social instability, disillusionment, and radicalization.

To manage these issues, the recruitment structure should be thoroughly and carefully redesigned. To begin with, the process should be institutionalized to open up every level of the process. Clear instructions, terms and conditions that are easily accessible and transparent system should be prioritised to restore confidence among applicants.

Secondly, the recruitment exercises are to be acutely inaccessible to political interference. Accountability and fairness can be increased by setting up independent oversight mechanisms or engaging bona fide third parties during the process.

In addition, the aptitude test that was carried out under the auspices of the Interior Ministry in collaboration of Trybenet, has been highly criticised that lacks any credibility. Aptitude test is an important instrument, which is used to measure the cognitive and reasoning capabilities and general qualifications of candidates to hold high security positions.

Conclusively, a flawed recruitment process is not just an administrative failure, but it is a direct danger to National Security. The security services rely on the integrity of the people recruited and any form of compromise in the process has a long-lasting effect.

The government must act decisively to deal with these challenges and make sure that the recruitment system is amenable to principles of justice, equity and national interest. Only at that point can the country create a security apparatus that will be effective as well as trusted by its citizens.