
Audio By Carbonatix
Parliament’s Finance Committee has dismissed assertions by policy think tank Danquah Institute that a $3 billion Chinese loan before the house lacks the necessary details for proper scrutiny.Government says it secured the facility to undertake various projects including the construction of fishing habours, landing sites and the irrigation facilities in the Afram Plains.But the institute wants government to withdraw the agreement.“We will therefore recommend to government to withdraw this omnibus $3 billion facility from Parliament and, instead, present to Parliament for specific approval each of the projects involved with requisite details in order to allow the House to do proper financial and technical scrutiny to each project,” it said in a statement.Executive Director of the institute Gabby Asare Otchere-Darko later told Joy News that China has unfair advantage under the terms of the loan.“Our government decides to come to Parliament with an omnibus project totaling $3 billion and then asking Parliament to approve of this entire facility without providing Parliament specific details or specific programmes as it is ordinarily done when government is bringing any project to Parliament for approval in terms of funding,” he said.But Chairman of Parliament’s Finance Committee James Avedzi says Mr. Otchere-Darko’s claims are untrue.“Are they the only people who know everything and that anything government is doing they are against it,” he questioned.He indicated that the committee had been conferring with the various ministries involved to determine the way forward.“We did all these things and we have covered all the ministries,” he said.Mr Avedzi said Parliament would consider the loan on its own merit but government would have to return to the house to seek approval to undertake individual projects under the facility.“When it comes to that level, government must come back to Parliament and say 'this is the contract we are giving to Contractor A to do this project and these are the terms of this contract'. So looking at the facility as a good facility and the projects they want to use the facility for, we as Parliament [are] comfortable,” he stressed.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Bellingham and Kane secure top spot for England
3 hours -
2026 World Cup: Ghana lose to Croatia to finish third in Group L
3 hours -
Clarke steps down as Scotland boss after World Cup exit
3 hours -
Heatwave breaks records in Germany, Denmark and Czech Republic
3 hours -
Burkina Faso severs diplomatic ties with France
4 hours -
Zipline medical drone delivery: Ghana operations decline as Nigeria expands to reach 100m people
4 hours -
Israel strikes southern Lebanon as Hezbollah condemns new deal
4 hours -
Government, Zoomlion reopen Achimota Transfer Station to tackle post-flood waste crisis
5 hours -
Ghana and Ukraine: Defence rapprochement raises questions about transparency and mandate
6 hours -
PURC donates computers to UCC Institute for Oil and Gas Studies, assures university over electricity billing dispute
7 hours -
MSDA commissions 50,000-litre automated water project for Saltpond Municipal Hospital
7 hours -
Gov’t committed to protecting pension funds for Ghanaian workers – Vice President
7 hours -
Mastercard Foundation charges AIMS Ghana Class of 2026 to drive innovation, leadership and employment across Africa
7 hours -
Black Stars go again tonight
8 hours -
‘AIMS rewrites the equations of your life’ — Alumna Dr Perpetual Andam Boiquaye challenges graduates to pursue bold ambitions
8 hours