Audio By Carbonatix
Austria has passed a law banning headscarves in schools for girls under 14 years.
The conservative-led coalition of three centrist parties, the ÖVP, the SPÖ and the Neos, says the law is a "clear commitment to gender equality, but critics say it will fuel anti-Muslim feeling in the country and could be unconstitutional.
The measure will apply to girls in both public and private schools.
In 2020, a similar headscarf ban for girls under 10 was struck down by the Constitutional Court, because it specifically targeted Muslims.
The terms of the new law mean girls under 14 will be forbidden from wearing "traditional Muslim" head coverings such as hijabs or burkas.
If a student violates the ban, they must have a series of discussions with school authorities and their legal guardians. If there are repeated violations, the child and youth welfare agency must be notified.
As a last resort, families or guardians could be fined up to €800 (£700).
Members of the government say this is about empowering young girls, arguing it is to protect them "from oppression".
Speaking ahead of the vote, the parliamentary leader of the liberal Neos party, Yannick Shetty, said it was "not a measure against a religion. It is a measure to protect the freedom of girls in this country," and added that the ban would affect about 12,000 children.
The opposition far-right Freedom Party of Austria, the FPÖ, which voted in favour of the ban, said it did not go far enough.
It described the ban as "a first step", which should be widened to include all pupils and school staff.
"There needs to be a general ban on headscarves in schools; political Islam has no place here, the FPÖ's spokesperson on families, Ricarda Berger, said.
Sigrid Maurer from the opposition Greens called the new law "clearly unconstitutional".
The official Islamic Community in Austria, the IGGÖ, said the ban violated fundamental rights and would split society.
In a statement on its website, it said, "Instead of empowering children, they will be stigmatised and marginalised."
The IGGÖ said it would review "the constitutionality of the law and take all necessary steps."
"The Constitutional Court already ruled unequivocally in 2020 that such a ban is unconstitutional, as it specifically targets a religious minority and violates the principle of equality," the IGGÖ said.
The government says it has tried to avoid that.
"Will it pass muster with the Constitutional Court? I don't know. We have done our best," Shetty said.
An awareness-raising trial period will start in February 2026, with the ban fully going into force next September - the beginning of the new school year.
Latest Stories
-
Jo Malone sued for using her own name in collaboration with Zara
5 hours -
Mahama avoiding expensive jet rentals by using brother’s aircraft – Gov’t
5 hours -
All service contracts at Accra International Airport to be held to high delivery standards -Transport Minister warns
5 hours -
Frequent breakdown of presidential jet forced interim use of brother’s aircraft – Felix Ofosu Kwakye
5 hours -
Mother calls for thorough probe into daughter’s death at AdawsoÂ
5 hours -
World Bank Group MD to visit Ghana and Liberia
5 hours -
Automated Road Traffic Law set for passage by end of March
6 hours -
Ghana to use automated technology to catch traffic offenders in real-time
6 hours -
Two robbery suspects killed as police dismantle gang on Obuasi–Dunkwa highway
6 hours -
Mahama’s use of brother’s jet not permanent, it’s due to lack of reliable state aircraft – Felix Ofosu Kwakye
7 hours -
GACL terminates Fixed Base Operation agreement with McDan Aviation over persistent debt
7 hours -
‘What exactly is the problem if Mahama uses his brother’s jet?’ – Kwakye Ofosu asks critics
7 hours -
I’ll be surprised if Ghanaians think Mahama using his brother’s jet comes at no cost to the state – Asafo-Adjei
8 hours -
PassionAir announces Kumasi route disruptions, apologises to passengers
8 hours -
Police dismantle armed robbery gang on Obuasi–Dunkwa highway
8 hours
