
Audio By Carbonatix
Chief Justice nominee, Gertrude Torkornoo, has explained that Supreme Court judges coming to a unanimous decision on cases brought before them as seen in many cases, does not in anyway suggest bias or a miscarriage of justice.
Speaking in Parliament during her vetting on Friday, she said that “When you encounter unanimous decision, it tells you that the law is totally on the side of the position taken by the court, that every member of the court in fidelity to their judicial oath cannot take a different position, it tells you that that is what the law is,” Justice Torkornoo said.
There have been raging criticisms from some Ghanaians particularly opposition party elements against the judiciary, with a growing perception that the institution is a ‘Unanimous FC’; a coined term which connotes the collectiveness of thoughts in recent rulings of the apex Court.
Following their unanimous decision on some cases in the past year, the Supreme Court came under heavy criticism with some citizens accusing them of bias.
Also, in 2022, Attorney-General Godfred Dame called out former President John Mahama after he criticised the judiciary and claimed that it lacks what it takes to redeem its sunken image.
However, the Chief Justice nominee noted that the apex court’s unanimous decisions are never based on any bias or favoritism but solely on the law.
“The only response is to learn from what the law says, so it is not a matter of bias, it is a matter of the legal position.”
She also dismissed the popular opinion that most judges do the bidding of the authority that appointed them.
According to her, their workload as judges is very much unrelated to the appointing authority and hence has little influence on their act of service.
Justice Torkornoo said that “I think if there’s such a perception, it is a wrong perception, because the load of our work with respect to the ordinary Ghanaian hardly has anything to do with appointing authorities. On a daily basis, we are adjudicating tens and hundreds of cases involving the “ordinary joe”,” she said.
She emphasised that judges give decisions independently.
Latest Stories
-
Solvent governments may default if they lack liquidity to repay loans – World Bank
7 minutes -
It’s not a they problem, it’s our problem: We must learn to speak up regardless
19 minutes -
NADMO, Zoomlion launch multi-site drain clearing exercise to curb flooding in Greater Accra
26 minutes -
PR professionals embrace AI at WPRD Festival 2026 MasterLAB
35 minutes -
Minority Women’s Caucus condemns attack on Adwoa Safo, demands full police probe
38 minutes -
Body of teenage girl retrieved from vehicle at Alajo after floods
47 minutes -
EPA eyes redeployment of idle Zodiac boat to fight water pollution and flooding
58 minutes -
Flood victims in Accra to receive free NHIS registration as health authorities warn of disease risk
1 hour -
Parliament ratifies air services agreements with six countries to boost connectivity
2 hours -
Unlocking Value in Africa’s Cocoa: Lessons from Hershey
2 hours -
Ghana Must Act Now: Accra’s flooding crisis
2 hours -
Flood victims in Ayawaso Central receive relief from Qatar Charity and NADMO
2 hours -
Bawumia’s call for state of emergency over floods is justified – Manhyia South MP
2 hours -
Oppong Nkrumah says World Bank report clears NPP over GARID funds and blames fiscal restrictions for project delays
2 hours -
Adu-Boahene trial: Special operations claim was an afterthought; GH¢49.1m was for personal use – EOCO witness tells court
2 hours